H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Rainer Schuettler vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 0-1
Ernests Gulbis holds a 1–0 lead over Rainer Schuettler in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ernests Gulbis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ernests Gulbis won the 2010 Bangkok fourth round 7-6(4) 6-7(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
LAT
Age 37
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2010* | Bangkok | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Ernests Gulbis | 7-6(4) 6-7(4) 6-4 | Rainer Schuettler | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rainer Schuettler | #1,007 | #5 | 3,205 | 1,989 | 313 | 323 | 49.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Ernests Gulbis | #893 | #10 | 2,725 | 2,139 | 221 | 232 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Rainer Schuettler | Ernests Gulbis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #446 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #141 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #117 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #61 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #124 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #48 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #90 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #45 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #24 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 33–31 | 51.6% | #43 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 2002 | 38–29 | 56.7% | #33 | 1,715 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #136 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 2003 | 70–27 | 72.2% | #6 | 1,956 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #24 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 |
| 2004 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #42 | 1,718 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #13 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 |
| 2005 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #88 | 1,675 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #81 | 1,765 | 0 | 6 |
| 2006 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #97 | 1,536 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,785 | 0 | 6 |
| 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #99 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #199 | 1,716 | 0 | 6 |
| 2008 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #33 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #95 | 1,813 | 0 | 6 |
| 2009 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #85 | 1,641 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #226 | 1,533 | 0 | 6 |
| 2010 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #84 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,562 | 0 | 6 |
| 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #132 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,509 | 0 | 6 |