H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Rainer Schuettler vs Jim Courier H2H: 0-1

Jim Courier holds a 1–0 lead over Rainer Schuettler in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jim Courier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1999 Canadian Open round of 64 7-6(2) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rainer Schuettler
GER Age 50 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Jim Courier
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jim Courier #46 7-6(2) 6-2 Rainer Schuettler #52 Match data Aug 4, 1999* R64 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rainer Schuettler #1,007 #5 3,205 1,987 315 326 49.1% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Jim Courier #728 #1 3,973 2,216 489 223 68.7% 4 5 0 5 9 23

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rainer Schuettler Jim Courier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1987 0–2 0.0% #346 1,483 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1988 21–15 58.3% #43 1,712 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1989 30–18 62.5% #24 1,879 0 1
19 1995 0–1 0.0% #446 1,494 0 0 1990 39–21 65.0% #25 1,862 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 1991 57–17 77.0% #2 2,049 1 4
21 1997 5–2 71.4% #117 1,567 0 0 1992 68–16 81.0% #1 2,074 3 9
22 1998 12–15 44.4% #124 1,588 0 0 1993 58–17 77.3% #3 1,959 4 14
23 1999 23–28 45.1% #48 1,610 0 1 1994 43–19 69.4% #13 1,890 4 14
24 2000 21–26 44.7% #45 1,702 0 1 1995 59–20 74.7% #8 1,989 4 18
25 2001 33–31 51.6% #43 1,781 0 2 1996 28–17 62.2% #26 1,852 4 19
26 2002 38–29 56.7% #33 1,715 0 2 1997 34–19 64.2% #21 1,827 4 22
27 2003 70–27 72.2% #6 1,954 0 4 1998 19–17 52.8% #77 1,737 4 23
28 2004 25–29 46.3% #42 1,707 0 4 1999 29–20 59.2% #32 1,795 4 23
29 2005 17–24 41.5% #88 1,673 0 4 2000 4–5 44.4% #290 1,737 4 23
30 2006 10–22 31.2% #97 1,543 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 2007 7–13 35.0% #99 1,653 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 2008 21–23 47.7% #33 1,750 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2009 15–26 36.6% #85 1,646 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2010 13–17 43.3% #84 1,657 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2011 5–13 27.8% #132 1,645 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rainer Schuettler Jim Courier
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 12 10 22 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 19 10 29 65.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
19 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 16 8 24 66.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 37 8 45 82.2% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
21 1997 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 36 6 42 85.7% 15 2 17 88.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 7 22 68.2%
22 1998 5 6 11 45.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1993 39 9 48 81.3% 12 1 13 92.3% 6 1 7 85.7% 1 6 7 14.3%
23 1999 12 11 23 52.2% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1994 17 8 25 68.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
24 2000 15 13 28 53.6% 4 9 13 30.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 49 12 61 80.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0%
25 2001 25 16 41 61.0% 3 9 12 25.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1996 10 7 17 58.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
26 2002 27 18 45 60.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 26 10 36 72.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 2003 44 15 59 74.6% 15 9 24 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 1 8 87.5% 1998 6 8 14 42.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2004 5 14 19 26.3% 13 9 22 59.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1999 14 12 26 53.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4%
29 2005 8 11 19 42.1% 3 9 12 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2000 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 7 10 17 41.2% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 12 14 26 46.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 9 16 25 36.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2010 7 13 20 35.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2011 2 7 9 22.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 191 177 368 51.9% 58 89 147 39.5% 44 36 80 55.0% 22 24 46 47.8% — 285 114 399 71.4% 108 45 153 70.6% 26 17 43 60.5% 70 47 117 59.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 585/641 of Rainer Schuettler's and 473/566 of Jim Courier's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Rainer Schuettler Jim Courier
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1995 1/1 2.0 5.0 67.6% 60.0% 45.8% 63.6% 22.2% 55.4% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 60/74 5.4 2.2 63.3% 73.8% 56.0% 62.7% 44.2% 67.4% 41.3%
21 1997 5/7 3.2 1.8 59.3% 63.4% 56.6% 24.9% 74.4% 60.9% 41.2% 1992 69/84 5.3 2.4 60.8% 77.6% 55.0% 64.3% 45.3% 68.7% 41.7%
22 1998 22/27 1.3 3.1 61.5% 67.2% 50.8% 53.4% 40.1% 60.5% 37.5% 1993 61/75 4.9 2.7 60.8% 75.1% 56.5% 67.7% 45.3% 67.9% 41.7%
23 1999 45/51 2.4 3.2 57.7% 65.5% 50.6% 56.1% 45.9% 59.1% 39.3% 1994 54/62 4.1 2.5 61.6% 75.3% 53.5% 59.7% 45.0% 66.8% 40.8%
24 2000 37/47 3.7 3.2 56.4% 70.8% 51.9% 57.4% 41.7% 62.1% 38.1% 1995 66/79 5.4 2.9 62.0% 75.7% 54.4% 67.1% 47.4% 67.5% 40.1%
25 2001 55/64 3.6 3.7 57.5% 68.9% 51.4% 54.5% 44.3% 61.3% 38.5% 1996 40/45 5.9 3.2 60.1% 74.7% 53.8% 57.4% 43.4% 66.6% 39.6%
26 2002 53/67 3.7 3.3 57.2% 70.2% 53.3% 54.4% 51.7% 63.0% 41.8% 1997 43/53 4.8 3.0 59.8% 73.7% 52.8% 54.7% 45.2% 65.1% 38.2%
27 2003 93/97 3.5 2.7 60.0% 71.1% 53.7% 56.1% 47.7% 64.2% 42.8% 1998 31/36 4.9 2.2 64.3% 71.9% 52.8% 60.1% 36.6% 64.9% 36.9%
28 2004 53/54 4.0 3.0 58.9% 70.0% 53.9% 56.4% 39.3% 63.5% 38.9% 1999 41/49 6.0 2.5 66.0% 75.0% 55.7% 62.7% 39.4% 68.4% 36.5%
29 2005 41/41 3.5 3.4 58.9% 66.5% 47.8% 53.6% 41.0% 58.7% 38.5% 2000 8/9 6.3 2.8 59.3% 72.8% 52.6% 60.6% 42.6% 64.7% 34.7%
30 2006 31/32 3.1 2.7 57.0% 68.2% 52.7% 48.7% 40.8% 61.6% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 20/20 3.7 2.5 57.3% 67.5% 50.3% 52.7% 40.1% 59.9% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 42/44 4.0 2.8 59.9% 69.3% 50.7% 56.4% 43.1% 61.9% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 40/41 3.4 3.0 62.7% 65.5% 49.1% 54.2% 47.1% 59.3% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2010 29/30 2.7 2.7 60.1% 70.5% 52.7% 50.9% 42.3% 63.3% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2011 18/18 3.7 3.0 62.1% 66.8% 48.5% 67.0% 44.9% 59.7% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 585/641 3.4 3.0 59.0% 68.8% 51.7% 54.8% 44.5% 61.7% 39.0% — 473/712 5.2 2.6 61.9% 75.0% 54.6% 62.5% 44.1% 67.2% 39.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rainer Schuettler Jim Courier
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1484 102.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.12
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1712 137.9 — — — — +4 -126 — 58.0% +0.40 5–6 (45%) 9–2 (82%) 104.7 -0.43
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1879 152.8 — — — — -3 -151 — 59.7% +0.64 7–10 (41%) 12–7 (63%) 102.2 -3.51
19 1995 1494 103.6 -0.83 +2.82 0.810 45.9% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.10 1990 1863 156.8 — — — — +8 -32 -251 63.3% +1.10 8–8 (50%) 9–9 (50%) 97.9 -0.68
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 2049 168.0 +6.14 +3.91 1.266 54.2% +16 -86 -347 71.0% +1.28 14–5 (74%) 12–9 (57%) 106.5 -2.20
21 1997 1567 110.8 -0.37 +1.44 1.052 51.0% +27 — — 64.3% +0.86 1–1 1–0 — +0.82 1992 2075 169.6 +6.83 +4.55 1.332 54.9% +17 +15 -351 74.4% +1.70 12–5 (71%) 24–11 (69%) 105.2 -1.89
22 1998 1588 122.0 -1.11 +0.05 0.950 48.9% +11 -33 +38 43.8% -0.41 5–3 (63%) 3–3 (50%) 104.6 +0.68 1993 1959 164.0 +6.33 +3.71 1.299 54.3% -24 +192 -55 73.5% +1.61 9–7 (56%) 15–12 (56%) 95.7 -1.11
23 1999 1611 139.3 -2.17 +1.38 0.961 49.4% +29 +4 -40 43.0% -0.29 5–2 (71%) 6–9 (40%) 104.1 -0.92 1994 1890 155.5 +5.14 +2.68 1.228 53.4% +9 +222 -1 66.7% +1.16 7–7 (50%) 10–13 (43%) 90.0 +0.52
24 2000 1702 141.9 -0.29 +0.58 1.005 50.3% +3 -88 -114 48.1% +0.16 6–7 (46%) 7–9 (44%) 100.2 -1.26 1995 1990 160.9 +5.29 +3.10 1.233 53.6% +22 +69 -186 71.5% +1.26 10–8 (56%) 26–14 (65%) 102.8 -0.63
25 2001 1782 137.2 -0.89 +0.75 0.994 50.0% +30 -241 -174 52.3% +0.10 6–11 (35%) 12–14 (46%) 96.2 +0.71 1996 1852 152.7 +4.18 +1.56 1.183 52.8% +59 +140 -53 60.7% +0.83 4–7 (36%) 12–11 (52%) 93.2 -0.33
26 2002 1715 143.9 +1.02 +3.65 1.131 52.4% +11 -116 -83 56.4% +0.58 12–11 (52%) 14–13 (52%) 99.7 -0.13 1997 1828 150.6 +2.66 +1.74 1.095 51.4% +66 +101 -50 62.0% +0.60 8–11 (42%) 12–10 (55%) 92.2 -1.90
27 2003 1955 155.2 +1.75 +5.40 1.197 53.2% +25 -223 -206 66.0% +1.00 15–9 (63%) 18–5 (78%) 109.8 +1.68 1998 1737 137.2 +2.52 -1.01 1.053 50.7% +53 +134 — 51.1% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 97.8 +0.91
28 2004 1708 138.0 +0.64 +2.30 1.063 51.1% -9 +66 +59 47.9% -0.06 9–16 (36%) 14–17 (45%) 91.4 -1.11 1999 1795 135.6 +4.87 -0.80 1.155 52.2% -5 +9 -45 56.8% +0.45 12–5 (71%) 20–11 (65%) 110.4 +0.59
29 2005 1674 126.5 -2.32 +0.58 0.932 48.8% +26 -24 +88 43.9% -0.53 4–8 (33%) 10–7 (59%) 97.6 -0.99 2000 1737 117.5 +0.53 -1.12 0.982 49.4% -2 — — 48.0% -0.44 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 98.0 +0.33
30 2006 1544 124.6 -0.96 -0.49 0.953 49.0% +64 +44 +122 37.8% -0.45 2–5 (29%) 2–8 (20%) 92.7 +0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 1654 131.7 -1.11 -0.45 0.897 48.3% +27 -96 — 38.5% -0.69 4–4 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 100.0 -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1751 131.9 -0.77 -0.49 0.939 48.7% -49 -221 +83 47.1% -0.18 12–8 (60%) 5–15 (25%) 99.7 +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1646 128.9 -3.64 +0.63 0.911 48.4% -1 -170 +188 40.2% -0.60 6–10 (38%) 10–7 (59%) 96.9 +1.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2010 1658 132.1 -0.31 +1.67 1.047 50.8% -15 — +164 44.7% -0.09 3–7 (30%) 2–7 (22%) 92.9 +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2011 1646 122.2 -2.38 -1.55 0.894 48.4% -37 -210 +200 38.3% -0.72 0–6 (0%) 3–4 (43%) 91.6 -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2012 1648 107.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1987 142.7 -0.53 +1.67 1.017 50.4% +13 -94 +29 49.6% +0.04 90–108 (45%) 112–123 (48%) 95.5 +0.27 — 2217 162.1 +5.11 +2.51 1.217 53.3% +16 +52 -127 65.7% +1.03 104–89 (54%) 174–120 (59%) 100.1 -1.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.