H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Rainer Schuettler vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 2-2
Rainer Schuettler and Lleyton Hewitt are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Rainer Schuettler leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rainer Schuettler won the 2007 Mumbai quarterfinal 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2007* | Mumbai | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Rainer Schuettler | 6-3 7-5 | Lleyton Hewitt | Match data |
| Mar 8, 2006* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Lleyton Hewitt | 7-6(3) 2-6 6-4 | Rainer Schuettler | Match data |
| Apr 24, 2004* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Rainer Schuettler | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Lleyton Hewitt | Match data |
| Feb 21, 2004* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Lleyton Hewitt | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Rainer Schuettler | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rainer Schuettler | #1,007 | #5 | 3,205 | 1,989 | 313 | 323 | 49.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Lleyton Hewitt | #636 | #1 | 5,205 | 2,159 | 564 | 241 | 70.1% | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 23 | 30 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Rainer Schuettler | Lleyton Hewitt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #446 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #550 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #117 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #100 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #124 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 40–18 | 69.0% | #25 | 1,853 | 0 | 2 |
| 1999 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #48 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 53–15 | 77.9% | #7 | 1,993 | 0 | 6 |
| 2000 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #45 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 71–15 | 82.6% | #1 | 2,116 | 1 | 12 |
| 2001 | 33–31 | 51.6% | #43 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 61–16 | 79.2% | #1 | 2,062 | 2 | 17 |
| 2002 | 38–29 | 56.7% | #33 | 1,715 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 29–10 | 74.4% | #17 | 1,939 | 2 | 19 |
| 2003 | 70–27 | 72.2% | #6 | 1,956 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 64–16 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,076 | 2 | 23 |
| 2004 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #42 | 1,718 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 36–9 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,092 | 2 | 24 |
| 2005 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #88 | 1,675 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #20 | 1,964 | 2 | 25 |
| 2006 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #97 | 1,536 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #21 | 1,925 | 2 | 26 |
| 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #99 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #67 | 1,936 | 2 | 26 |
| 2008 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #33 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #22 | 1,956 | 2 | 27 |
| 2009 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #85 | 1,641 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #54 | 1,907 | 2 | 28 |
| 2010 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #84 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #186 | 1,817 | 2 | 28 |
| 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #132 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #83 | 1,867 | 2 | 28 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #60 | 1,884 | 2 | 28 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,841 | 2 | 30 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,715 | 2 | 30 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #633 | 1,727 | 2 | 30 |