H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Rainer Schuettler vs Nicolas Lapentti H2H: 2-1
Rainer Schuettler holds a 2–1 lead over Nicolas Lapentti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Lapentti leads 1–0 on clay, while Rainer Schuettler leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Rainer Schuettler won the 2008 Stockholm fourth round 7-6(6) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ECU
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2009 | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Rainer Schuettler | 6-3 7-5 | Nicolas Lapentti | Match data |
| Oct 10, 2008* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Rainer Schuettler | 7-6(6) 6-3 | Nicolas Lapentti | Match data |
| Jun 14, 2001* | Halle | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Rainer Schuettler | 6-4 6-4 | Nicolas Lapentti | Match data |
| May 16, 2001* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Nicolas Lapentti | 6-4 7-6(3) | Rainer Schuettler | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rainer Schuettler | #1,007 | #5 | 3,205 | 1,989 | 313 | 323 | 49.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Nicolas Lapentti | #885 | #6 | 2,293 | 1,935 | 282 | 280 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Rainer Schuettler | Nicolas Lapentti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #446 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 5–0 | 100.0% | #109 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #117 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #124 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #48 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 16–29 | 35.6% | #90 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #45 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 52–24 | 68.4% | #8 | 1,883 | 0 | 3 |
| 2001 | 33–31 | 51.6% | #43 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 2002 | 38–29 | 56.7% | #33 | 1,715 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #23 | 1,837 | 0 | 4 |
| 2003 | 70–27 | 72.2% | #6 | 1,956 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,714 | 0 | 5 |
| 2004 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #42 | 1,718 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #57 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 |
| 2005 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #88 | 1,675 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,600 | 0 | 5 |
| 2006 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #97 | 1,536 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #95 | 1,579 | 0 | 5 |
| 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #99 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 |
| 2008 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #33 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,611 | 0 | 5 |
| 2009 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #85 | 1,641 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 2010 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #84 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 |
| 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #132 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 |