H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Rainer Schuettler vs Tim Henman H2H: 3-3

Rainer Schuettler and Tim Henman are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Rainer Schuettler won the 2004 Monte Carlo Masters quarterfinal 6-3 6-1.

GER Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 3
6 main draw meetings
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 25, 2004* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Rainer Schuettler #6 6-3 6-1 Tim Henman #7 Match data
Mar 14, 2001* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tim Henman #10 6-2 5-7 7-6(4) Rainer Schuettler #52 Match data
Jan 21, 2000* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Tim Henman #13 6-2 4-1 (ret.) Rainer Schuettler #60 Match data
Jan 10, 1999* Doha ATP 250 F Hard Rainer Schuettler #124 6-4 5-7 6-1 Tim Henman #7 Match data
Feb 27, 1998* London ATP 250 R16 Carpet Tim Henman #21 4-6 6-3 6-4 Rainer Schuettler #118 Match data
Feb 5, 1998* Split ATP 250 R32 Carpet Rainer Schuettler #115 6-3 1-6 6-3 Tim Henman #18 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rainer Schuettler #1,007 #5 3,205 1,989 313 323 49.2% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Rainer Schuettler Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1995 0–1 0.0% #446 1,494 0 0 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
1997 5–2 71.4% #117 1,567 0 0 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0
1998 12–15 44.4% #124 1,587 0 0 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0
1999 23–28 45.1% #48 1,609 0 1 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
2000 20–25 44.4% #45 1,687 0 1 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
2001 33–31 51.6% #43 1,780 0 2 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4
2002 38–29 56.7% #33 1,715 0 2 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6
2003 70–27 72.2% #6 1,956 0 4 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8
2004 25–28 47.2% #42 1,718 0 4 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9
2005 17–24 41.5% #88 1,675 0 4 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11
2006 10–22 31.2% #97 1,536 0 4 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11
2007 7–13 35.0% #99 1,650 0 4 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
2008 20–22 47.6% #33 1,744 0 4 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11
2009 15–26 36.6% #85 1,641 0 4 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11
2010 13–17 43.3% #84 1,666 0 4
2011 5–13 27.8% #132 1,648 0 4