H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Rainer Schuettler vs Tomas Zib H2H: 0-2
Tomas Zib holds a 2–0 lead over Rainer Schuettler in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tomas Zib leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Zib won the 2005 Casablanca third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2005* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tomas Zib | 6-2 6-2 | Rainer Schuettler | Match data |
| Aug 19, 1999* | Washington | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tomas Zib | 6-7(2) 7-5 3-0 (ret.) | Rainer Schuettler | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rainer Schuettler | #1,007 | #5 | 3,205 | 1,989 | 313 | 323 | 49.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Tomas Zib | #1,339 | #51 | 688 | 1,636 | 41 | 94 | 30.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Rainer Schuettler | Tomas Zib | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #446 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #117 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #124 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #117 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #48 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #224 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #45 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #145 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 33–31 | 51.6% | #43 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #121 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 38–29 | 56.7% | #33 | 1,715 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #59 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 70–27 | 72.2% | #6 | 1,956 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 4–20 | 16.7% | #133 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #42 | 1,718 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #138 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #88 | 1,675 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #416 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #97 | 1,536 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #99 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #33 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #85 | 1,641 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #84 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #132 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |