H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Rajeev Ram vs Horacio Zeballos H2H: 1-1

Rajeev Ram and Horacio Zeballos are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rajeev Ram leads 1–0 on clay, while Horacio Zeballos leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rajeev Ram won the 2016 Quito round of 32 6-4 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rajeev Ram
USA Age 42 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Horacio Zeballos
ARG Age 41 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rajeev Ram #81 6-4 7-6(6) Horacio Zeballos #118 Match data Feb 4, 2016* R32 Quito ATP 250 Clay
Horacio Zeballos #126 6-3 7-6(4) Rajeev Ram #141 Match data Mar 8, 2014* R128 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rajeev Ram #1,076 #56 826 1,747 57 94 37.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Horacio Zeballos #841 #39 1,027 1,877 87 131 39.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rajeev Ram Horacio Zeballos
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2003 1–1 50.0% — 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2004 1–3 25.0% #297 1,474 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2005 2–2 50.0% #195 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2006 0–1 0.0% #197 1,457 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2007 0–1 0.0% #253 1,417 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2008 2–4 33.3% #190 1,478 0 0 2009 5–5 50.0% #45 1,613 0 0
25 2009 8–6 57.1% #79 1,587 0 1 2010 14–26 35.0% #110 1,595 0 0
26 2010 6–18 25.0% #184 1,591 0 1 2011 5–6 45.5% #109 1,598 0 0
27 2011 2–3 40.0% #149 1,606 0 1 2012 3–9 25.0% #85 1,591 0 0
28 2012 7–9 43.8% #132 1,636 0 1 2013 14–23 37.8% #56 1,587 0 1
29 2013 4–11 26.7% #127 1,646 0 1 2014 7–9 43.8% #123 1,633 0 1
30 2014 3–7 30.0% #139 1,660 0 1 2015 2–4 33.3% #124 1,645 0 1
31 2015 7–6 53.8% #89 1,654 0 2 2016 7–13 35.0% #71 1,670 0 1
32 2016 12–19 38.7% #129 1,616 0 2 2017 20–22 47.6% #66 1,759 0 1
33 2017 2–2 50.0% #353 1,582 0 2 2018 10–14 41.7% #173 1,721 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rajeev Ram Horacio Zeballos
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2009 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2009 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% 2010 5 13 18 27.8% 8 11 19 42.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — —
27 2011 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
28 2012 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 2013 3 9 12 25.0% 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2013 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 2014 3 4 7 42.9% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
30 2014 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2015 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2015 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% 2016 6 5 11 54.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
32 2016 9 11 20 45.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
33 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 3 5 8 37.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career — 34 71 105 32.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 19 16 35 54.3% — 30 51 81 37.0% 55 69 124 44.4% 2 11 13 15.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 150/151 of Rajeev Ram's and 218/218 of Horacio Zeballos's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Rajeev Ram Horacio Zeballos
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2002 1/1 3.0 3.0 41.5% 55.6% 47.4% 60.0% 50.0% 50.8% 31.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 2/2 4.5 7.0 45.7% 78.9% 42.5% 55.0% 52.8% 59.1% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 4/4 4.8 5.0 54.3% 75.1% 44.7% 56.9% 44.6% 61.5% 28.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 4/4 11.3 3.8 54.9% 75.5% 45.8% 56.4% 54.3% 62.1% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 1/1 2.0 1.0 68.9% 74.5% 34.8% 0.0% 100.0% 62.2% 26.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 1/1 6.0 4.0 59.0% 71.4% 52.9% 55.6% 33.3% 63.9% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 6/6 6.0 1.5 63.5% 69.6% 41.8% 45.8% 44.2% 59.3% 32.5% 2009 10/10 6.8 2.7 65.2% 71.0% 57.0% 65.7% 54.8% 66.1% 32.9%
25 2009 14/14 9.1 2.6 58.3% 77.3% 53.3% 73.2% 36.0% 67.3% 33.0% 2010 40/40 5.8 2.2 63.1% 67.6% 47.7% 60.4% 40.6% 60.5% 32.0%
26 2010 24/24 10.2 3.3 58.5% 71.2% 47.0% 42.4% 32.4% 61.1% 28.1% 2011 11/11 6.0 2.7 61.9% 73.7% 49.3% 65.4% 44.9% 64.3% 34.0%
27 2011 5/5 4.2 2.0 62.1% 70.2% 44.7% 44.7% 54.2% 61.1% 30.3% 2012 12/12 5.5 2.8 62.0% 67.1% 51.1% 62.2% 33.6% 61.2% 33.9%
28 2012 16/16 5.1 2.5 58.3% 74.9% 48.0% 58.8% 40.8% 63.4% 33.3% 2013 37/37 5.6 2.7 62.6% 69.2% 49.1% 59.1% 36.2% 61.6% 30.6%
29 2013 15/15 7.4 2.6 61.6% 69.7% 46.1% 58.8% 39.6% 60.8% 33.6% 2014 16/16 4.0 1.8 59.1% 72.9% 52.7% 59.2% 36.6% 64.5% 30.5%
30 2014 10/10 6.1 2.8 62.0% 70.2% 48.9% 62.0% 32.6% 62.2% 31.9% 2015 6/6 7.2 2.8 62.6% 67.8% 44.1% 67.3% 35.5% 59.1% 31.0%
31 2015 13/13 9.8 2.4 63.0% 75.6% 53.0% 65.0% 44.1% 67.1% 31.1% 2016 20/20 6.2 3.1 60.1% 72.6% 51.9% 55.7% 34.3% 64.1% 28.4%
32 2016 30/31 7.2 3.0 63.5% 72.6% 50.5% 60.9% 35.2% 64.4% 33.3% 2017 42/42 5.8 2.2 64.1% 71.2% 54.7% 56.0% 37.5% 65.0% 32.5%
33 2017 4/4 6.8 4.3 55.8% 74.6% 53.0% 69.8% 22.4% 65.2% 32.7% 2018 24/24 6.4 3.0 63.5% 71.6% 50.7% 69.3% 38.9% 64.1% 31.6%
Career — 150/151 7.6 2.9 60.2% 72.8% 48.6% 57.4% 38.6% 63.1% 32.0% — 218/218 5.8 2.5 62.6% 70.3% 51.0% 60.6% 38.6% 63.0% 31.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rajeev Ram Horacio Zeballos
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2001 1486 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2002 1479 99.7 +2.35 +0.19 0.641 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 1493 105.3 -0.85 +0.13 0.972 50.4% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 1474 102.9 -3.28 -0.64 0.731 44.5% +28 — — 27.3% -1.55 1–0 1–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 1490 105.6 -0.27 -2.37 0.916 49.5% +13 — — 54.5% 0.00 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 1458 100.0 +0.64 -0.34 0.700 45.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.05 2007 1461 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 1418 101.5 -4.12 -2.14 1.157 51.3% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.10 2008 1506 105.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 1479 114.5 -1.05 -1.49 0.798 46.4% +22 — — 40.0% -0.80 0–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.19 2009 1613 122.4 +1.10 -2.29 0.970 50.1% +38 — — 53.8% +0.27 0–2 6–5 (55%) — +0.76
25 2009 1587 122.4 +1.13 -1.70 1.010 50.2% -72 — +148 52.8% +0.11 3–1 (75%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.97 2010 1595 130.9 -1.88 -3.97 0.808 46.6% -14 +43 -118 37.2% -1.03 6–7 (46%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.16
26 2010 1592 116.0 -1.64 -5.51 0.722 44.9% -24 — +108 33.3% -1.42 3–6 (33%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.56 2011 1598 122.3 +1.03 -2.09 0.954 49.5% — +59 — 48.0% -0.04 0–1 3–4 (43%) — -0.49
27 2011 1606 115.8 -0.85 -2.60 0.778 45.9% +3 — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 0–1 — +0.01 2012 1591 117.8 -2.87 -2.13 0.873 48.1% — +83 — 31.0% -0.66 0–1 1–4 (20%) — +0.33
28 2012 1636 116.2 -0.05 -3.04 0.910 48.7% -41 — +70 46.9% -0.37 0–1 4–3 (57%) — +1.50 2013 1587 139.5 -1.23 -4.62 0.798 46.8% -106 +128 — 39.6% -0.52 10–5 (67%) 6–13 (32%) — +1.72
29 2013 1647 124.3 -1.42 -2.56 0.856 47.5% -6 — +7 40.0% -0.65 0–5 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.29 2014 1633 127.6 +0.28 -3.69 0.858 48.3% -130 +105 — 41.7% -0.45 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.69
30 2014 1661 116.5 -1.88 -1.96 0.844 47.1% 0 — — 30.4% -1.13 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.65 2015 1645 109.3 -1.33 -2.33 0.758 45.3% — +91 — 35.7% -1.72 0–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.09
31 2015 1654 122.8 +0.37 -2.07 0.944 49.7% -77 — +184 52.8% -0.14 4–3 (57%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.64 2016 1671 134.9 +0.65 -5.16 0.790 47.3% -42 -28 -181 38.3% -0.77 2–1 (67%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.23
32 2016 1617 133.1 -0.28 -2.91 0.934 49.1% +29 -87 +110 40.3% -0.65 3–4 (43%) 12–5 (71%) — +0.66 2017 1759 146.3 +0.83 -2.99 0.928 48.8% -104 +58 — 45.6% -0.27 8–4 (67%) 13–13 (50%) — -1.38
33 2017 1583 110.5 +0.38 -1.49 0.939 48.0% — -27 — 44.4% -0.78 1–0 2–0 — +0.44 2018 1721 138.6 +0.08 -3.27 0.880 48.8% -71 +37 — 43.9% -0.35 4–6 (40%) 8–8 (50%) — -1.23
34 2018 1563 95.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1705 98.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 1551 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1748 123.1 -0.63 -2.79 0.869 47.8% -13 -67 +107 41.7% -0.67 18–26 (41%) 44–31 (59%) 104.5 +4.17 — 1877 137.5 -0.40 -3.58 0.854 47.8% -57 +70 -150 41.4% -0.54 32–29 (52%) 52–65 (44%) 103.5 +0.40

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.