H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Rajeev Ram vs Karol Beck H2H: 2-1

Rajeev Ram holds a 2–1 lead over Karol Beck in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Rajeev Ram leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Rajeev Ram won the 2010 Atlanta round of 32 6-4 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rajeev Ram
USA Age 42 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Karol Beck
SVK Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rajeev Ram #149 6-4 7-6(4) Karol Beck #110 Match data Jul 22, 2010* R32 Atlanta ATP 250 Hard
Rajeev Ram #93 1-6 6-3 6-4 Karol Beck #85 Match data Jun 9, 2010* R64 Queen's Club Championships ATP 250 Grass
Karol Beck #45 6-2 6-4 Rajeev Ram #234 Match data Jul 22, 2005* R16 Indianapolis ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rajeev Ram #1,076 #56 826 1,747 57 94 37.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Karol Beck #1,630 #36 932 1,785 60 110 35.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rajeev Ram Karol Beck
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2003 1–1 50.0% — 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2004 1–3 25.0% #297 1,474 0 0 2002 2–3 40.0% #117 1,573 0 0
21 2005 2–2 50.0% #195 1,490 0 0 2003 8–23 25.8% #66 1,546 0 0
22 2006 0–1 0.0% #197 1,457 0 0 2004 21–21 50.0% #44 1,725 0 0
23 2007 0–1 0.0% #253 1,417 0 0 2005 18–26 40.9% #57 1,666 0 0
24 2008 2–4 33.3% #190 1,478 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2009 8–6 57.1% #79 1,587 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 2010 6–18 25.0% #184 1,591 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2011 2–3 40.0% #149 1,606 0 1 2009 4–7 36.4% #114 1,602 0 0
28 2012 7–9 43.8% #132 1,636 0 1 2010 1–11 8.3% #103 1,469 0 0
29 2013 4–11 26.7% #127 1,646 0 1 2011 4–10 28.6% #101 1,552 0 0
30 2014 3–7 30.0% #139 1,660 0 1 2012 2–9 18.2% #141 1,592 0 0
31 2015 7–6 53.8% #89 1,654 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2016 12–19 38.7% #129 1,616 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2017 2–2 50.0% #353 1,582 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rajeev Ram Karol Beck
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 2005 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 6 12 18 33.3% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 9 12 21 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 3 9 66.7%
23 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 13 17 30 43.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2008 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2012 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2010 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
29 2013 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2011 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2014 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2012 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2015 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 9 11 20 45.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 34 71 105 32.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 19 16 35 54.3% — — — — — 36 67 103 35.0% 2 19 21 9.5% 13 18 31 41.9% 9 6 15 60.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 150/151 of Rajeev Ram's and 168/170 of Karol Beck's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Rajeev Ram Karol Beck
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2002 1/1 3.0 3.0 41.5% 55.6% 47.4% 60.0% 50.0% 50.8% 31.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 2/2 4.5 7.0 45.7% 78.9% 42.5% 55.0% 52.8% 59.1% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 4/4 4.8 5.0 54.3% 75.1% 44.7% 56.9% 44.6% 61.5% 28.2% 2002 5/5 14.0 6.4 51.4% 79.6% 47.6% 65.7% 36.3% 64.1% 36.5%
21 2005 4/4 11.3 3.8 54.9% 75.5% 45.8% 56.4% 54.3% 62.1% 34.7% 2003 30/31 6.2 4.9 53.2% 70.4% 44.4% 52.2% 40.3% 58.3% 36.0%
22 2006 1/1 2.0 1.0 68.9% 74.5% 34.8% 0.0% 100.0% 62.2% 26.5% 2004 41/42 7.2 4.3 54.9% 74.3% 49.2% 56.7% 46.3% 63.0% 36.5%
23 2007 1/1 6.0 4.0 59.0% 71.4% 52.9% 55.6% 33.3% 63.9% 41.8% 2005 44/44 5.7 4.1 53.7% 71.5% 44.3% 54.4% 39.0% 58.8% 36.9%
24 2008 6/6 6.0 1.5 63.5% 69.6% 41.8% 45.8% 44.2% 59.3% 32.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 14/14 9.1 2.6 58.3% 77.3% 53.3% 73.2% 36.0% 67.3% 33.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 24/24 10.2 3.3 58.5% 71.2% 47.0% 42.4% 32.4% 61.1% 28.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 5/5 4.2 2.0 62.1% 70.2% 44.7% 44.7% 54.2% 61.1% 30.3% 2009 11/11 6.5 4.1 57.4% 66.9% 44.5% 43.2% 37.8% 57.1% 36.7%
28 2012 16/16 5.1 2.5 58.3% 74.9% 48.0% 58.8% 40.8% 63.4% 33.3% 2010 12/12 4.9 4.2 53.3% 64.5% 48.5% 55.7% 36.3% 57.1% 33.5%
29 2013 15/15 7.4 2.6 61.6% 69.7% 46.1% 58.8% 39.6% 60.8% 33.6% 2011 14/14 5.6 5.0 53.8% 68.1% 43.4% 50.8% 26.4% 56.6% 31.7%
30 2014 10/10 6.1 2.8 62.0% 70.2% 48.9% 62.0% 32.6% 62.2% 31.9% 2012 11/11 5.8 4.0 55.1% 69.2% 47.5% 51.5% 33.6% 59.6% 30.1%
31 2015 13/13 9.8 2.4 63.0% 75.6% 53.0% 65.0% 44.1% 67.1% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 30/31 7.2 3.0 63.5% 72.6% 50.5% 60.9% 35.2% 64.4% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 4/4 6.8 4.3 55.8% 74.6% 53.0% 69.8% 22.4% 65.2% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 150/151 7.6 2.9 60.2% 72.8% 48.6% 57.4% 38.6% 63.1% 32.0% — 168/170 6.4 4.4 54.2% 71.0% 46.0% 53.8% 39.2% 59.5% 35.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rajeev Ram Karol Beck
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2001 1486 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2002 1479 99.7 +2.35 +0.19 0.641 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 1493 105.3 -0.85 +0.13 0.972 50.4% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 1474 102.9 -3.28 -0.64 0.731 44.5% +28 — — 27.3% -1.55 1–0 1–1 — +0.23 2002 1573 116.1 -0.04 -0.17 1.019 49.8% -23 — — 43.8% -0.06 1–1 3–4 (43%) — +0.13
21 2005 1490 105.6 -0.27 -2.37 0.916 49.5% +13 — — 54.5% 0.00 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.22 2003 1546 121.6 -2.83 -1.28 0.864 47.4% +8 -72 +13 31.6% -1.14 4–9 (31%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.80
22 2006 1458 100.0 +0.64 -0.34 0.700 45.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.05 2004 1725 134.1 -0.29 +0.30 0.986 49.9% -16 -253 -67 48.2% -0.05 8–6 (57%) 10–9 (53%) — +0.31
23 2007 1418 101.5 -4.12 -2.14 1.157 51.3% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.10 2005 1667 137.1 -2.31 +0.62 0.895 48.1% +8 -236 +15 41.3% -0.65 6–5 (55%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.51
24 2008 1479 114.5 -1.05 -1.49 0.798 46.4% +22 — — 40.0% -0.80 0–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 1587 122.4 +1.13 -1.70 1.010 50.2% -72 — +148 52.8% +0.11 3–1 (75%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 1592 116.0 -1.64 -5.51 0.722 44.9% -24 — +108 33.3% -1.42 3–6 (33%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.56 2008 1595 101.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 1606 115.8 -0.85 -2.60 0.778 45.9% +3 — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 0–1 — +0.01 2009 1602 115.7 -2.69 -0.72 0.855 47.0% +17 — — 42.4% -0.58 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) — 0.00
28 2012 1636 116.2 -0.05 -3.04 0.910 48.7% -41 — +70 46.9% -0.37 0–1 4–3 (57%) — +1.50 2010 1469 105.2 -4.39 -2.45 0.782 45.5% +24 — +129 16.7% -1.73 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.44
29 2013 1647 124.3 -1.42 -2.56 0.856 47.5% -6 — +7 40.0% -0.65 0–5 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.29 2011 1553 112.5 -3.38 -3.25 0.730 44.7% -87 — +141 34.4% -1.09 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — +1.03
30 2014 1661 116.5 -1.88 -1.96 0.844 47.1% 0 — — 30.4% -1.13 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.65 2012 1592 125.6 -2.01 -3.28 0.746 45.2% -17 — — 20.7% -1.79 1–1 3–3 (50%) — -0.30
31 2015 1654 122.8 +0.37 -2.07 0.944 49.7% -77 — +184 52.8% -0.14 4–3 (57%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.64 2013 1545 102.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 1617 133.1 -0.28 -2.91 0.934 49.1% +29 -87 +110 40.3% -0.65 3–4 (43%) 12–5 (71%) — +0.66 2014 1559 108.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 1583 110.5 +0.38 -1.49 0.939 48.0% — -27 — 44.4% -0.78 1–0 2–0 — +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2018 1563 95.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 1551 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1748 123.1 -0.63 -2.79 0.869 47.8% -13 -67 +107 41.7% -0.67 18–26 (41%) 44–31 (59%) 104.5 +4.17 — 1786 128.8 -2.09 -0.71 0.877 47.7% -7 -158 +31 37.9% -0.74 26–27 (49%) 33–37 (47%) 104.3 -0.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.