H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Rajeev Ram vs Miki Jankovic.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rajeev Ram | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | Miki Jankovic | Match data | Apr 30, 2012 | Q1 | Belgrade | ATP 250 | Clay |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rajeev Ram | #1,076 | #56 | 826 | 1,747 | 57 | 94 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Miki Jankovic | #1,609 | #256 | 204 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rajeev Ram | Miki Jankovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #297 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2009 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #79 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2010 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #149 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2012 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #132 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #127 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2014 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #139 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #89 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #129 | 1,616 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #353 | 1,582 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Rajeev Ram | Miki Jankovic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2001 | 1486 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1488 | 98.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2002 | 1479 | 99.7 | +2.35 | +0.19 | 0.641 | 41.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 1493 | 105.3 | -0.85 | +0.13 | 0.972 | 50.4% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | — | — | — | -0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 1474 | 102.9 | -3.28 | -0.64 | 0.731 | 44.5% | +28 | — | — | 27.3% | -1.55 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.23 | 2015 | 1492 | 100.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 1490 | 105.6 | -0.27 | -2.37 | 0.916 | 49.5% | +13 | — | — | 54.5% | 0.00 | 0–1 | 3–1 (75%) | — | +0.22 | 2016 | 1470 | 95.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 1458 | 100.0 | +0.64 | -0.34 | 0.700 | 45.1% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 1418 | 101.5 | -4.12 | -2.14 | 1.157 | 51.3% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 1479 | 114.5 | -1.05 | -1.49 | 0.798 | 46.4% | +22 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.80 | 0–1 | 3–3 (50%) | — | +0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2009 | 1587 | 122.4 | +1.13 | -1.70 | 1.010 | 50.2% | -72 | — | +148 | 52.8% | +0.11 | 3–1 (75%) | 2–4 (33%) | — | +0.97 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2010 | 1592 | 116.0 | -1.64 | -5.51 | 0.722 | 44.9% | -24 | — | +108 | 33.3% | -1.42 | 3–6 (33%) | 7–6 (54%) | — | +0.56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2011 | 1606 | 115.8 | -0.85 | -2.60 | 0.778 | 45.9% | +3 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.50 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2012 | 1636 | 116.2 | -0.05 | -3.04 | 0.910 | 48.7% | -41 | — | +70 | 46.9% | -0.37 | 0–1 | 4–3 (57%) | — | +1.50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 1647 | 124.3 | -1.42 | -2.56 | 0.856 | 47.5% | -6 | — | +7 | 40.0% | -0.65 | 0–5 (0%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2014 | 1661 | 116.5 | -1.88 | -1.96 | 0.844 | 47.1% | 0 | — | — | 30.4% | -1.13 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | +0.65 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 1654 | 122.8 | +0.37 | -2.07 | 0.944 | 49.7% | -77 | — | +184 | 52.8% | -0.14 | 4–3 (57%) | 8–3 (73%) | — | +0.64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2016 | 1617 | 133.1 | -0.28 | -2.91 | 0.934 | 49.1% | +29 | -87 | +110 | 40.3% | -0.65 | 3–4 (43%) | 12–5 (71%) | — | +0.66 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2017 | 1583 | 110.5 | +0.38 | -1.49 | 0.939 | 48.0% | — | -27 | — | 44.4% | -0.78 | 1–0 | 2–0 | — | +0.44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2018 | 1563 | 95.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2020 | 1551 | 95.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1748 | 123.1 | -0.63 | -2.79 | 0.869 | 47.8% | -13 | -67 | +107 | 41.7% | -0.67 | 18–26 (41%) | 44–31 (59%) | 104.5 | +4.17 | — | 1500 | 97.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sam Querrey | 1 | 4 | 5 | Feb 21, 2016 | H2H |
| Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 19, 2016 | H2H |
| Xavier Malisse | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jul 31, 2013 | H2H |
| Matthew Ebden | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 20, 2017 | H2H |
| Kei Nishikori | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 29, 2016 | H2H |
No career rivalry data available.