H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Rajeev Ram vs Paul Capdeville H2H: 1-0

Rajeev Ram holds a 1–0 lead over Paul Capdeville in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rajeev Ram leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rajeev Ram won the 2012 Los Angeles Open round of 16 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rajeev Ram
USA Age 42 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Paul Capdeville
CHI Age 43 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rajeev Ram #117 6-3 6-1 Paul Capdeville #139 Match data Jul 27, 2012* R16 Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Hard
Paul Capdeville #138 7-6(6) 6-7(5) 6-4 Rajeev Ram #229 Match data Apr 5, 2011* Q3 Q U.S. Men's Clay Court Championship ATP 250 Clay
Paul Capdeville #120 6-4 6-4 Rajeev Ram #201 Match data Aug 27, 2007 Q1 Q US Open Grand Slam Hard

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rajeev Ram #1,076 #56 826 1,747 57 94 37.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Paul Capdeville #1,186 #76 960 1,730 36 67 35.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rajeev Ram Paul Capdeville
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2003 1–1 50.0% — 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2004 1–3 25.0% #297 1,474 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #455 1,484 0 0
21 2005 2–2 50.0% #195 1,490 0 0 2004 0–1 0.0% #305 1,456 0 0
22 2006 0–1 0.0% #197 1,457 0 0 2005 1–1 50.0% #148 1,535 0 0
23 2007 0–1 0.0% #253 1,417 0 0 2006 6–11 35.3% #149 1,530 0 0
24 2008 2–4 33.3% #190 1,478 0 0 2007 12–12 50.0% #102 1,700 0 0
25 2009 8–6 57.1% #79 1,587 0 1 2008 6–13 31.6% #111 1,631 0 0
26 2010 6–18 25.0% #184 1,591 0 1 2009 8–14 36.4% #129 1,568 0 0
27 2011 2–3 40.0% #149 1,606 0 1 2010 1–1 50.0% #165 1,482 0 0
28 2012 7–9 43.8% #132 1,636 0 1 2011 0–7 0.0% #131 1,528 0 0
29 2013 4–11 26.7% #127 1,646 0 1 2012 1–5 16.7% #166 1,525 0 0
30 2014 3–7 30.0% #139 1,660 0 1 2013 1–1 50.0% #154 1,592 0 0
31 2015 7–6 53.8% #89 1,654 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2016 12–19 38.7% #129 1,616 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2017 2–2 50.0% #353 1,582 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rajeev Ram Paul Capdeville
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2005 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2008 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2007 9 8 17 52.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2009 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% 2008 4 9 13 30.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2009 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 2011 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2012 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 2011 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2013 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
30 2014 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2013 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 2015 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 9 11 20 45.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 34 71 105 32.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 19 16 35 54.3% — 21 35 56 37.5% 13 25 38 34.2% 2 7 9 22.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 150/151 of Rajeev Ram's and 100/103 of Paul Capdeville's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Rajeev Ram Paul Capdeville
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2002 1/1 3.0 3.0 41.5% 55.6% 47.4% 60.0% 50.0% 50.8% 31.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 2/2 4.5 7.0 45.7% 78.9% 42.5% 55.0% 52.8% 59.1% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 4/4 4.8 5.0 54.3% 75.1% 44.7% 56.9% 44.6% 61.5% 28.2% 2003 1/1 4.0 11.0 51.9% 55.0% 35.1% 30.0% 50.0% 45.5% 31.1%
21 2005 4/4 11.3 3.8 54.9% 75.5% 45.8% 56.4% 54.3% 62.1% 34.7% 2004 1/1 3.0 1.0 68.8% 56.8% 45.0% 55.6% 100.0% 53.1% 32.2%
22 2006 1/1 2.0 1.0 68.9% 74.5% 34.8% 0.0% 100.0% 62.2% 26.5% 2005 2/2 8.0 2.5 56.5% 66.8% 49.9% 52.3% 34.9% 59.4% 37.6%
23 2007 1/1 6.0 4.0 59.0% 71.4% 52.9% 55.6% 33.3% 63.9% 41.8% 2006 17/17 4.0 2.8 57.6% 68.6% 46.2% 49.6% 60.0% 59.2% 34.6%
24 2008 6/6 6.0 1.5 63.5% 69.6% 41.8% 45.8% 44.2% 59.3% 32.5% 2007 22/24 4.7 3.2 60.9% 66.5% 46.2% 54.8% 38.2% 58.7% 36.8%
25 2009 14/14 9.1 2.6 58.3% 77.3% 53.3% 73.2% 36.0% 67.3% 33.0% 2008 19/19 3.6 2.4 61.7% 64.6% 47.0% 49.4% 39.9% 58.1% 37.9%
26 2010 24/24 10.2 3.3 58.5% 71.2% 47.0% 42.4% 32.4% 61.1% 28.1% 2009 22/22 3.7 2.8 62.4% 67.7% 49.5% 43.7% 36.4% 60.8% 35.7%
27 2011 5/5 4.2 2.0 62.1% 70.2% 44.7% 44.7% 54.2% 61.1% 30.3% 2010 2/2 2.5 4.5 64.5% 70.7% 43.9% 58.3% 44.4% 61.7% 42.8%
28 2012 16/16 5.1 2.5 58.3% 74.9% 48.0% 58.8% 40.8% 63.4% 33.3% 2011 6/7 4.0 4.0 61.4% 60.6% 40.9% 54.8% 67.5% 53.4% 36.9%
29 2013 15/15 7.4 2.6 61.6% 69.7% 46.1% 58.8% 39.6% 60.8% 33.6% 2012 6/6 4.0 4.2 60.2% 66.1% 48.1% 53.3% 43.9% 58.8% 34.9%
30 2014 10/10 6.1 2.8 62.0% 70.2% 48.9% 62.0% 32.6% 62.2% 31.9% 2013 2/2 7.5 2.0 66.2% 74.8% 54.7% 68.8% 75.0% 68.0% 39.3%
31 2015 13/13 9.8 2.4 63.0% 75.6% 53.0% 65.0% 44.1% 67.1% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 30/31 7.2 3.0 63.5% 72.6% 50.5% 60.9% 35.2% 64.4% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 4/4 6.8 4.3 55.8% 74.6% 53.0% 69.8% 22.4% 65.2% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 150/151 7.6 2.9 60.2% 72.8% 48.6% 57.4% 38.6% 63.1% 32.0% — 100/103 4.1 3.1 60.9% 66.4% 47.0% 50.4% 45.5% 58.9% 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rajeev Ram Paul Capdeville
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2001 1486 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2002 1479 99.7 +2.35 +0.19 0.641 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 1493 105.3 -0.85 +0.13 0.972 50.4% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 1474 102.9 -3.28 -0.64 0.731 44.5% +28 — — 27.3% -1.55 1–0 1–1 — +0.23 2003 1484 96.4 -3.13 -3.45 0.570 38.4% — — — 33.3% -3.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.20
21 2005 1490 105.6 -0.27 -2.37 0.916 49.5% +13 — — 54.5% 0.00 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.22 2004 1456 96.0 -3.44 -1.82 0.687 43.1% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.22
22 2006 1458 100.0 +0.64 -0.34 0.700 45.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.05 2005 1536 113.6 +0.23 +0.69 0.926 49.3% — — — 42.9% 0.00 — — — -0.12
23 2007 1418 101.5 -4.12 -2.14 1.157 51.3% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.10 2006 1531 116.6 -3.29 -0.67 0.848 47.6% +35 -36 — 41.9% -0.61 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.26
24 2008 1479 114.5 -1.05 -1.49 0.798 46.4% +22 — — 40.0% -0.80 0–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.19 2007 1700 124.3 -3.60 +0.19 0.892 48.1% +27 -144 — 44.3% -0.18 5–1 (83%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.51
25 2009 1587 122.4 +1.13 -1.70 1.010 50.2% -72 — +148 52.8% +0.11 3–1 (75%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.97 2008 1631 119.8 -3.41 +0.96 0.904 47.9% +14 -7 — 42.0% -0.72 0–5 (0%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.55
26 2010 1592 116.0 -1.64 -5.51 0.722 44.9% -24 — +108 33.3% -1.42 3–6 (33%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.56 2009 1568 123.0 -2.11 -1.83 0.911 47.7% +56 +29 -95 42.9% -0.45 3–5 (38%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.80
27 2011 1606 115.8 -0.85 -2.60 0.778 45.9% +3 — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 0–1 — +0.01 2010 1482 105.1 -0.04 +0.28 1.119 52.2% — — — 50.0% +0.83 1–1 — — +0.15
28 2012 1636 116.2 -0.05 -3.04 0.910 48.7% -41 — +70 46.9% -0.37 0–1 4–3 (57%) — +1.50 2011 1529 112.0 -3.82 -1.53 0.792 45.7% -11 +105 — 17.6% -2.00 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — +0.02
29 2013 1647 124.3 -1.42 -2.56 0.856 47.5% -6 — +7 40.0% -0.65 0–5 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.29 2012 1525 114.2 -3.63 -1.30 0.848 47.1% -24 +106 — 33.3% -0.93 0–3 (0%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.19
30 2014 1661 116.5 -1.88 -1.96 0.844 47.1% 0 — — 30.4% -1.13 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.65 2013 1592 118.4 -0.58 +2.10 1.229 53.8% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — -0.18
31 2015 1654 122.8 +0.37 -2.07 0.944 49.7% -77 — +184 52.8% -0.14 4–3 (57%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.64 2014 1583 96.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 1617 133.1 -0.28 -2.91 0.934 49.1% +29 -87 +110 40.3% -0.65 3–4 (43%) 12–5 (71%) — +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 1583 110.5 +0.38 -1.49 0.939 48.0% — -27 — 44.4% -0.78 1–0 2–0 — +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2018 1563 95.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 1551 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1748 123.1 -0.63 -2.79 0.869 47.8% -13 -67 +107 41.7% -0.67 18–26 (41%) 44–31 (59%) 104.5 +4.17 — 1731 121.9 -2.98 -0.45 0.885 47.7% +24 +3 -95 40.3% -0.61 12–25 (32%) 16–17 (48%) 94.8 +1.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.