H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Rajeev Ram vs Wayne Odesnik H2H: 0-1

Wayne Odesnik holds a 1–0 lead over Rajeev Ram in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Wayne Odesnik leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wayne Odesnik won the 2010 Delray Beach Open first round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rajeev Ram
USA Age 42 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Wayne Odesnik
USA Age 40 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Wayne Odesnik #131 6-3 7-6(4) Rajeev Ram #101 Match data Mar 7, 2013 Q1 Q Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Rajeev Ram #231 6-4 6-4 Wayne Odesnik #160 Match data Jul 31, 2011 Q2 Q Washington Open ATP 500 Hard
Wayne Odesnik #108 6-3 6-2 Rajeev Ram #82 Match data Feb 25, 2010* R32 Delray Beach Open ATP 250 Hard
Wayne Odesnik #96 6-2 6-3 Rajeev Ram #210 Match data Feb 23, 2009 Q2 Q Delray Beach Open ATP 250 Hard

3 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rajeev Ram #1,076 #56 826 1,747 57 94 37.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Wayne Odesnik #267 #77 984 1,734 40 59 40.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rajeev Ram Wayne Odesnik
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0 2004 0–3 0.0% #383 1,463 0 0
19 2003 1–1 50.0% — 1,492 0 0 2005 0–2 0.0% #265 1,451 0 0
20 2004 1–3 25.0% #297 1,474 0 0 2006 0–1 0.0% #194 1,420 0 0
21 2005 2–2 50.0% #195 1,490 0 0 2007 4–3 57.1% #126 1,567 0 0
22 2006 0–1 0.0% #197 1,457 0 0 2008 13–15 46.4% #119 1,670 0 0
23 2007 0–1 0.0% #253 1,417 0 0 2009 10–13 43.5% #105 1,684 0 0
24 2008 2–4 33.3% #190 1,478 0 0 2010 7–7 50.0% #813 1,704 0 0
25 2009 8–6 57.1% #79 1,587 0 1 2011 0–1 0.0% #129 1,661 0 0
26 2010 6–18 25.0% #184 1,591 0 1 2012 4–6 40.0% #143 1,647 0 0
27 2011 2–3 40.0% #149 1,606 0 1 2013 2–3 40.0% #138 1,681 0 0
28 2012 7–9 43.8% #132 1,636 0 1 2014 0–5 0.0% #171 1,628 0 0
29 2013 4–11 26.7% #127 1,646 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2014 3–7 30.0% #139 1,660 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2015 7–6 53.8% #89 1,654 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2016 12–19 38.7% #129 1,616 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2017 2–2 50.0% #353 1,582 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rajeev Ram Wayne Odesnik
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2005 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
22 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 7 11 18 38.9% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 6 9 15 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2008 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2010 4 6 10 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
25 2009 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2011 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2012 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 2014 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2013 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 9 11 20 45.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 34 71 105 32.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 19 16 35 54.3% — 22 41 63 34.9% 18 13 31 58.1% 0 5 5 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 150/151 of Rajeev Ram's and 97/99 of Wayne Odesnik's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Rajeev Ram Wayne Odesnik
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2002 1/1 3.0 3.0 41.5% 55.6% 47.4% 60.0% 50.0% 50.8% 31.6% 2004 3/3 7.0 2.0 58.5% 64.4% 41.1% 52.4% 45.6% 55.0% 33.5%
19 2003 2/2 4.5 7.0 45.7% 78.9% 42.5% 55.0% 52.8% 59.1% 39.8% 2005 2/2 4.0 3.0 65.4% 64.6% 63.3% 55.0% 8.3% 64.2% 31.4%
20 2004 4/4 4.8 5.0 54.3% 75.1% 44.7% 56.9% 44.6% 61.5% 28.2% 2006 1/1 19.0 3.0 64.6% 68.8% 51.4% 58.3% 40.0% 62.6% 29.5%
21 2005 4/4 11.3 3.8 54.9% 75.5% 45.8% 56.4% 54.3% 62.1% 34.7% 2007 7/7 9.0 3.3 68.8% 70.3% 53.7% 58.7% 56.6% 65.2% 32.4%
22 2006 1/1 2.0 1.0 68.9% 74.5% 34.8% 0.0% 100.0% 62.2% 26.5% 2008 27/28 4.5 2.6 61.2% 67.7% 49.4% 56.6% 40.4% 60.8% 38.4%
23 2007 1/1 6.0 4.0 59.0% 71.4% 52.9% 55.6% 33.3% 63.9% 41.8% 2009 23/23 5.3 2.4 61.1% 66.3% 51.8% 57.7% 36.9% 60.6% 36.8%
24 2008 6/6 6.0 1.5 63.5% 69.6% 41.8% 45.8% 44.2% 59.3% 32.5% 2010 13/14 5.5 3.8 58.3% 68.2% 52.0% 71.2% 44.3% 61.4% 39.4%
25 2009 14/14 9.1 2.6 58.3% 77.3% 53.3% 73.2% 36.0% 67.3% 33.0% 2011 1/1 2.0 2.0 70.0% 50.0% 16.7% 28.6% — 40.0% 20.0%
26 2010 24/24 10.2 3.3 58.5% 71.2% 47.0% 42.4% 32.4% 61.1% 28.1% 2012 10/10 3.7 3.9 59.2% 65.3% 44.2% 58.2% 46.5% 56.5% 36.8%
27 2011 5/5 4.2 2.0 62.1% 70.2% 44.7% 44.7% 54.2% 61.1% 30.3% 2013 5/5 2.8 1.6 66.7% 61.8% 52.7% 47.3% 41.7% 58.5% 37.4%
28 2012 16/16 5.1 2.5 58.3% 74.9% 48.0% 58.8% 40.8% 63.4% 33.3% 2014 5/5 6.0 2.6 60.5% 59.9% 52.9% 51.9% 17.8% 57.6% 29.8%
29 2013 15/15 7.4 2.6 61.6% 69.7% 46.1% 58.8% 39.6% 60.8% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 10/10 6.1 2.8 62.0% 70.2% 48.9% 62.0% 32.6% 62.2% 31.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 13/13 9.8 2.4 63.0% 75.6% 53.0% 65.0% 44.1% 67.1% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 30/31 7.2 3.0 63.5% 72.6% 50.5% 60.9% 35.2% 64.4% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 4/4 6.8 4.3 55.8% 74.6% 53.0% 69.8% 22.4% 65.2% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 150/151 7.6 2.9 60.2% 72.8% 48.6% 57.4% 38.6% 63.1% 32.0% — 97/99 5.3 2.8 61.5% 66.3% 50.1% 58.0% 39.9% 60.1% 36.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rajeev Ram Wayne Odesnik
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2001 1486 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2002 1479 99.7 +2.35 +0.19 0.641 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13 2004 1463 94.9 -0.07 -1.72 0.744 44.7% — — — 22.2% -2.11 0–1 0–1 — +0.12
19 2003 1493 105.3 -0.85 +0.13 0.972 50.4% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.02 2005 1452 101.4 +0.34 -0.56 0.877 46.5% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.03
20 2004 1474 102.9 -3.28 -0.64 0.731 44.5% +28 — — 27.3% -1.55 1–0 1–1 — +0.23 2006 1421 97.3 -1.63 +0.51 0.791 47.1% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.14
21 2005 1490 105.6 -0.27 -2.37 0.916 49.5% +13 — — 54.5% 0.00 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.22 2007 1567 118.6 -0.22 -0.70 0.931 48.9% +10 — — 47.8% +0.04 4–2 (67%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.76
22 2006 1458 100.0 +0.64 -0.34 0.700 45.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.05 2008 1670 125.5 -2.14 +0.76 0.979 49.4% -43 -14 — 49.3% -0.07 5–4 (56%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.67
23 2007 1418 101.5 -4.12 -2.14 1.157 51.3% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.10 2009 1685 131.9 -2.07 +0.91 0.936 48.6% -19 -9 — 40.3% -0.69 7–3 (70%) 5–1 (83%) — -0.12
24 2008 1479 114.5 -1.05 -1.49 0.798 46.4% +22 — — 40.0% -0.80 0–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.19 2010 1705 130.0 -1.59 +1.55 1.020 50.9% -53 +3 — 55.9% +0.74 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.09
25 2009 1587 122.4 +1.13 -1.70 1.010 50.2% -72 — +148 52.8% +0.11 3–1 (75%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.97 2011 1662 102.8 -0.85 -1.17 0.333 30.7% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.05
26 2010 1592 116.0 -1.64 -5.51 0.722 44.9% -24 — +108 33.3% -1.42 3–6 (33%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.56 2012 1647 117.7 -3.09 -1.64 0.846 46.9% — +67 — 39.3% -0.86 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.14
27 2011 1606 115.8 -0.85 -2.60 0.778 45.9% +3 — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 0–1 — +0.01 2013 1682 126.7 +0.10 -0.21 0.901 48.1% — — — 50.0% -0.57 0–2 0–1 — -0.03
28 2012 1636 116.2 -0.05 -3.04 0.910 48.7% -41 — +70 46.9% -0.37 0–1 4–3 (57%) — +1.50 2014 1629 112.5 -2.53 -0.84 0.702 44.2% -11 — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.38
29 2013 1647 124.3 -1.42 -2.56 0.856 47.5% -6 — +7 40.0% -0.65 0–5 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.29 2015 1631 105.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 1661 116.5 -1.88 -1.96 0.844 47.1% 0 — — 30.4% -1.13 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 1654 122.8 +0.37 -2.07 0.944 49.7% -77 — +184 52.8% -0.14 4–3 (57%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 1617 133.1 -0.28 -2.91 0.934 49.1% +29 -87 +110 40.3% -0.65 3–4 (43%) 12–5 (71%) — +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 1583 110.5 +0.38 -1.49 0.939 48.0% — -27 — 44.4% -0.78 1–0 2–0 — +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2018 1563 95.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 1551 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1748 123.1 -0.63 -2.79 0.869 47.8% -13 -67 +107 41.7% -0.67 18–26 (41%) 44–31 (59%) 104.5 +4.17 — 1735 127.8 -1.78 +0.29 0.915 48.4% -29 +13 — 42.3% -0.50 21–18 (54%) 20–17 (54%) 105.5 +1.35

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.