H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Ramiro Benavides vs Ion Tiriac H2H: 0-2
Ion Tiriac holds a 2–0 lead over Ramiro Benavides in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ion Tiriac leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Ion Tiriac won the 1970 Indianapolis second round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BOL
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 87
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 1970* | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Ion Tiriac | 6-3 6-1 | Ramiro Benavides | Match data |
| Jul 29, 1970* | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Ion Tiriac | 6-3 6-1 | Ramiro Benavides | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ramiro Benavides | #1,003 | #124 | 0 | 1,563 | 44 | 108 | 28.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ion Tiriac | #439 | #55 | 0 | 1,899 | 228 | 190 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ramiro Benavides | Ion Tiriac | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1974 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #210 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1975 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #153 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1976 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 60–12 | 83.3% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1977 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #164 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1978 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #180 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 1979 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #149 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 27–16 | 62.8% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 1980 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #173 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | 1981 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #173 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 35–35 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,683 | 0 | 8 |
| 35 | 1982 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #221 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,622 | 0 | 8 |
| 36 | 1983 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #138 | 1,589 | 0 | 8 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #248 | 1,534 | 0 | 8 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,633 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #263 | 1,523 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #439 | 1,525 | 0 | 8 |