H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ramiro Benavides vs Jun Kuki H2H: 0-2
Jun Kuki holds a 2–0 lead over Ramiro Benavides in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jun Kuki leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jun Kuki won the 1976 Rome third round 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BOL
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 80
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 1976* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Jun Kuki | 6-1 7-5 | Ramiro Benavides | Match data |
| Feb 20, 1975* | Boca Raton | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jun Kuki | 6-2 7-5 | Ramiro Benavides | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ramiro Benavides | #1,003 | #124 | 0 | 1,563 | 44 | 108 | 28.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jun Kuki | #523 | #74 | 0 | 1,662 | 73 | 134 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ramiro Benavides | Jun Kuki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1970 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 3–12 | 20.0% | — | 1,406 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1974 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #210 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #217 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1975 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #153 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #101 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1976 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 11–28 | 28.2% | #161 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1977 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #164 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #78 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1978 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #180 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #201 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1979 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #149 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #146 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1980 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #173 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #389 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 1981 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #173 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #356 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 1982 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #221 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #356 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | 1983 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |