H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ramkumar Ramanathan vs Tatsuma Ito H2H: 0-1
Tatsuma Ito holds a 1–0 lead over Ramkumar Ramanathan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tatsuma Ito leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatsuma Ito won the 2015 Chennai third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
India
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2015* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tatsuma Ito | 6-3 6-3 | Ramkumar Ramanathan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ramkumar Ramanathan | #1,157 | #111 | 495 | 1,640 | 14 | 27 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tatsuma Ito | #1,822 | #60 | 725 | 1,726 | 28 | 56 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ramkumar Ramanathan | Tatsuma Ito | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #227 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #148 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #132 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #174 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #190 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #155 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #119 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #171 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #395 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #147 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #186 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |