H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Raul Antonio Viver vs Claudio Panatta H2H: 1-2
Claudio Panatta holds a 2–1 lead over Raul Antonio Viver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Claudio Panatta leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Claudio Panatta won the 1985 Bologna fourth round 4-6 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ECU
Age 65
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 66
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 1985* | Bologna | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Claudio Panatta | 4-6 7-6 6-3 | Raul Antonio Viver | Match data |
| Apr 18, 1985* | Bari | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Claudio Panatta | 7-6 6-0 | Raul Antonio Viver | Match data |
| Sep 13, 1984* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Raul Antonio Viver | 7-6 6-7 6-3 | Claudio Panatta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raul Antonio Viver | #957 | #94 | 267 | 1,566 | 20 | 49 | 29.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Claudio Panatta | #1,038 | #46 | 18 | 1,748 | 100 | 135 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Raul Antonio Viver | Claudio Panatta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1979 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #300 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #482 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #279 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #76 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1984 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #121 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #153 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1988 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #153 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #225 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #260 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #132 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #557 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #524 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |