H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Raul Antonio Viver vs Francesco Cancellotti H2H: 2-2
Raul Antonio Viver and Francesco Cancellotti are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay. Most recently, Raul Antonio Viver won the 1989 San Marino third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ECU
Age 65
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 63
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 1989* | San Marino | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Raul Antonio Viver | 6-4 6-1 | Francesco Cancellotti | Match data |
| Aug 17, 1989* | St. Vincent | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Francesco Cancellotti | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Raul Antonio Viver | Match data |
| Jun 15, 1989* | Bologna | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Raul Antonio Viver | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | Francesco Cancellotti | Match data |
| Sep 14, 1984* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Francesco Cancellotti | 6-3 6-1 | Raul Antonio Viver | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raul Antonio Viver | #957 | #94 | 267 | 1,566 | 20 | 49 | 29.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Francesco Cancellotti | #708 | #21 | 264 | 1,857 | 111 | 112 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Raul Antonio Viver | Francesco Cancellotti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1979 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #300 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #69 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #26 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #279 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #58 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1984 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #242 | 1,575 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #74 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #107 | 1,591 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #114 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1988 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #153 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #258 | 1,555 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #260 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #280 | 1,529 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #524 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |