H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Raul Antonio Viver vs Francisco Maciel H2H: 1-1
Raul Antonio Viver and Francisco Maciel are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Raul Antonio Viver leads 1–0 on clay, while Francisco Maciel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Francisco Maciel won the 1986 Montreal / Toronto second round 6-4 4-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ECU
Age 65
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 62
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 1986* | Montreal / Toronto | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Francisco Maciel | 6-4 4-6 7-6 | Raul Antonio Viver | Match data |
| Sep 25, 1985* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Raul Antonio Viver | 6-2 6-2 | Francisco Maciel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raul Antonio Viver | #957 | #94 | 267 | 1,566 | 20 | 49 | 29.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Francisco Maciel | #873 | #35 | 130 | 1,680 | 33 | 43 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Raul Antonio Viver | Francisco Maciel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1979 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #300 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #193 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #71 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #56 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #279 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #271 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1984 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #353 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1988 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #153 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #260 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #524 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |