H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Raul Antonio Viver vs Guillermo Vilas H2H: 0-1
Guillermo Vilas holds a 1–0 lead over Raul Antonio Viver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Guillermo Vilas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Guillermo Vilas won the 1987 Boston second round 6-4 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ECU
Age 65
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 73
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 1987* | Boston | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Guillermo Vilas | 6-4 2-6 6-4 | Raul Antonio Viver | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raul Antonio Viver | #957 | #94 | 267 | 1,566 | 20 | 49 | 29.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Guillermo Vilas | #1,186 | #2 | 47 | 2,338 | 898 | 282 | 76.1% | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 55 | 63 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Raul Antonio Viver | Guillermo Vilas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1979 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #300 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 18–15 | 54.5% | — | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #31 | 1,851 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 88–22 | 80.0% | #5 | 2,171 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #279 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 87–18 | 82.9% | #2 | 2,129 | 0 | 13 |
| 23 | 1984 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 82–20 | 80.4% | #6 | 2,079 | 0 | 19 |
| 24 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 128–15 | 89.5% | #2 | 2,303 | 2 | 35 |
| 25 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 61–8 | 88.4% | #3 | 2,216 | 3 | 42 |
| 26 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 70–21 | 76.9% | #6 | 2,087 | 4 | 46 |
| 27 | 1988 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #153 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 67–17 | 79.8% | #4 | 2,050 | 4 | 50 |
| 28 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #260 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 64–16 | 80.0% | #6 | 2,035 | 4 | 53 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 70–16 | 81.4% | #4 | 2,014 | 4 | 60 |
| 30 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 51–17 | 75.0% | #11 | 1,947 | 4 | 63 |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #28 | 1,791 | 4 | 63 |
| 32 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #524 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #39 | 1,767 | 4 | 63 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,760 | 4 | 63 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #71 | 1,717 | 4 | 63 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #126 | 1,630 | 4 | 63 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #408 | 1,601 | 4 | 63 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #463 | 1,577 | 4 | 63 |