H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Raul Antonio Viver vs Heinz Gunthardt H2H: 0-1
Heinz Gunthardt holds a 1–0 lead over Raul Antonio Viver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Heinz Gunthardt leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Heinz Gunthardt won the 1985 Roland Garros second round 1-6 6-1 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ECU
Age 65
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 67
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 1985* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Heinz Gunthardt | 1-6 6-1 6-1 6-1 | Raul Antonio Viver | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raul Antonio Viver | #957 | #94 | 267 | 1,566 | 20 | 49 | 29.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Heinz Gunthardt | #1,013 | #22 | 0 | 1,966 | 225 | 189 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Raul Antonio Viver | Heinz Gunthardt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1979 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #300 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #51 | 1,812 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #279 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #38 | 1,813 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1984 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #85 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #25 | 1,853 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #36 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1988 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #153 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #251 | 1,670 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #260 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #954 | 1,663 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #524 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |