H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Raul Antonio Viver vs Ricardo Ycaza H2H: 0-3
Ricardo Ycaza holds a 3–0 lead over Raul Antonio Viver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ricardo Ycaza leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Ricardo Ycaza won the 1982 Quito third round 7-5 3-6 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ECU
Age 65
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
ECU
Age 68
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 1982* | Quito | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ricardo Ycaza | 7-5 3-6 8-6 | Raul Antonio Viver | Match data |
| Jun 16, 1981* | Venice | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ricardo Ycaza | 6-1 6-3 | Raul Antonio Viver | Match data |
| Nov 6, 1980* | Quito | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ricardo Ycaza | 7-6 7-6 | Raul Antonio Viver | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raul Antonio Viver | #957 | #94 | 267 | 1,566 | 20 | 49 | 29.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ricardo Ycaza | #773 | #44 | 0 | 1,755 | 60 | 91 | 39.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Raul Antonio Viver | Ricardo Ycaza | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1979 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #300 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #108 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #162 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #279 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1984 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #76 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #99 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1988 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #153 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #260 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #524 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |