H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Raul Antonio Viver vs Wojtek Fibak H2H: 0-1
Wojtek Fibak holds a 1–0 lead over Raul Antonio Viver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Wojtek Fibak leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Wojtek Fibak won the 1980 North Conway second round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ECU
Age 65
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 1980* | North Conway | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Wojtek Fibak | 6-2 6-1 | Raul Antonio Viver | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raul Antonio Viver | #957 | #94 | 267 | 1,566 | 20 | 49 | 29.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Wojtek Fibak | #566 | #10 | 0 | 2,089 | 520 | 309 | 62.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Raul Antonio Viver | Wojtek Fibak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1979 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #300 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 39–33 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 74–31 | 70.5% | #14 | 2,070 | 0 | 3 |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 60–30 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,989 | 0 | 4 |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #279 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 60–32 | 65.2% | #21 | 1,895 | 0 | 5 |
| 1984 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 59–22 | 72.8% | #15 | 1,976 | 0 | 7 |
| 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 58–25 | 69.9% | #14 | 1,941 | 0 | 10 |
| 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #17 | 1,846 | 0 | 11 |
| 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 52–26 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,988 | 0 | 14 |
| 1988 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #153 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,779 | 0 | 14 |
| 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #260 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #45 | 1,727 | 0 | 14 |
| 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #62 | 1,721 | 0 | 14 |
| 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #125 | 1,636 | 0 | 14 |
| 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #524 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,572 | 0 | 14 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #570 | 1,573 | 0 | 14 |