H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Raul Ramirez vs Rod Laver H2H: 2-2
Raul Ramirez and Rod Laver are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Rod Laver leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Raul Ramirez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Raul Ramirez won the 1975 Charlotte semifinal 6-2 0-6 7-6(0).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MEX
Age 73
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 87
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 1975* | Charlotte | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Raul Ramirez | 6-2 0-6 7-6(0) | Rod Laver | Match data |
| Mar 23, 1975* | Caracas Wct | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Rod Laver | 7-6(3) 6-2 | Raul Ramirez | Match data |
| Feb 8, 1975* | St. Petersburg Wct | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Raul Ramirez | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Rod Laver | Match data |
| Nov 16, 1973* | Sydney Indoor | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Rod Laver | 6-0 7-5 | Raul Ramirez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raul Ramirez | #744 | #4 | 0 | 2,146 | 531 | 261 | 67.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 |
| Rod Laver | #662 | #3 | 0 | 2,300 | 576 | 147 | 79.7% | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 72 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Raul Ramirez | Rod Laver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1972 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1973 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #26 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1974 | 69–35 | 66.3% | #19 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1975 | 67–29 | 69.8% | #13 | 1,983 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1976 | 96–33 | 74.4% | #5 | 2,054 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1977 | 65–25 | 72.2% | #8 | 1,984 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1978 | 70–29 | 70.7% | #8 | 1,949 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1979 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #40 | 1,878 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1980 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #35 | 1,789 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1981 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #32 | 1,870 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1982 | 28–13 | 68.3% | #26 | 1,809 | 0 | 19 | 1968 | 73–19 | 79.3% | — | 1,881 | 1 | 13 |
| 30 | 1983 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #74 | 1,837 | 0 | 20 | 1969 | 97–14 | 87.4% | — | 2,161 | 5 | 29 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 89–15 | 85.6% | — | 2,213 | 5 | 42 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 85–20 | 81.0% | — | 2,155 | 5 | 49 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 50–16 | 75.8% | — | 2,016 | 5 | 54 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 67–16 | 80.7% | #8 | 2,088 | 5 | 61 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 45–10 | 81.8% | #4 | 2,115 | 5 | 67 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 52–13 | 80.0% | #10 | 2,087 | 5 | 72 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #73 | 1,995 | 5 | 72 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,927 | 5 | 72 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #216 | 1,917 | 5 | 72 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #662 | 1,901 | 5 | 72 |