H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Raymond Moore vs Charlie Pasarell H2H: 2-1
Raymond Moore holds a 2–1 lead over Charlie Pasarell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Raymond Moore leads 1–0 on carpet, while Charlie Pasarell leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Raymond Moore won the 1976 Las Vegas fourth round 2-6 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 79
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 82
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 1976* | Las Vegas | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Raymond Moore | 2-6 7-5 6-3 | Charlie Pasarell | Match data |
| Apr 17, 1975* | Denver Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Raymond Moore | (w/o) | Charlie Pasarell | Match data |
| Jun 20, 1969* | London / Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Charlie Pasarell | 6-3 8-10 6-1 | Raymond Moore | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raymond Moore | #503 | #32 | 0 | 1,892 | 357 | 376 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Charlie Pasarell | #312 | #35 | 0 | 1,939 | 302 | 275 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Raymond Moore | Charlie Pasarell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 35–23 | 60.3% | — | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 32–39 | 45.1% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 17–28 | 37.8% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1972 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 43–31 | 58.1% | — | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1973 | 36–36 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1974 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #89 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 26–32 | 44.8% | — | 1,801 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1975 | 30–33 | 47.6% | #61 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1976 | 39–31 | 55.7% | #39 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 40–31 | 56.3% | #47 | 1,834 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1977 | 35–30 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,800 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #51 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1978 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #138 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #63 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1979 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #99 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #56 | 1,815 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 1980 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #112 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 1981 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #100 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #200 | 1,607 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | 1982 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #312 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 |