H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Raymond Moore vs Earl Butch Buchholz H2H: 1-2
Earl Butch Buchholz holds a 2–1 lead over Raymond Moore in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Earl Butch Buchholz leads 2–0 on carpet, while Raymond Moore leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Earl Butch Buchholz won the 1969 Chicago quarterfinal 8-7.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 79
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 1969* | Chicago | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Earl Butch Buchholz | 8-7 | Raymond Moore | Match data |
| May 1, 1969 | Japanese Championships | ATP 250 | RR | Carpet | Earl Butch Buchholz | 6-4 3-6 6-5 | Raymond Moore | Match data |
| Oct 11, 1968* | Durban Wct | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Raymond Moore | 6-3 2-6 10-8 | Earl Butch Buchholz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raymond Moore | #503 | #32 | 0 | 1,892 | 357 | 376 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Earl Butch Buchholz | #555 | #156 | 0 | 1,941 | 98 | 81 | 54.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Raymond Moore | Earl Butch Buchholz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 35–23 | 60.3% | — | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 46–34 | 57.5% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 5 |
| 1969 | 32–39 | 45.1% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 41–32 | 56.2% | — | 1,884 | 0 | 6 |
| 1970 | 17–28 | 37.8% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 8–7 | 53.3% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 6 |
| 1971 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 6 |
| 1972 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 6 |
| 1973 | 36–36 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #172 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 |
| 1974 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #89 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #360 | 1,791 | 0 | 6 |
| 1975 | 30–33 | 47.6% | #61 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,772 | 0 | 6 |
| 1976 | 39–31 | 55.7% | #39 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | 35–30 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,800 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #138 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #99 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #112 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #100 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |