H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Renzo Furlan vs Andrei Olhovskiy H2H: 1-1
Renzo Furlan and Andrei Olhovskiy are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrei Olhovskiy leads 1–0 on carpet, while Renzo Furlan leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrei Olhovskiy won the 1995 Moscow third round 7-6(3) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 1995* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Andrei Olhovskiy | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Renzo Furlan | Match data |
| Aug 8, 1991* | Prague | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Renzo Furlan | 7-6(3) 5-7 6-4 | Andrei Olhovskiy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renzo Furlan | #1,479 | #19 | 1,235 | 1,844 | 209 | 231 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Andrei Olhovskiy | #1,310 | #49 | 690 | 1,750 | 113 | 162 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Renzo Furlan | Andrei Olhovskiy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1989 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #222 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1990 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #77 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1991 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #52 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #302 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #41 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 37–31 | 54.4% | #29 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #136 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #40 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #80 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #65 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #144 | 1,514 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #97 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #225 | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #118 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #236 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 0–14 | 0.0% | #442 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,540 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1256 | 1,470 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #194 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |