H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Renzo Furlan vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 2-1

Renzo Furlan holds a 2–1 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Renzo Furlan leads 2–0 on clay, while Cedric Pioline leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Renzo Furlan won the 1998 Prague third round 0-6 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Renzo Furlan
ITA Age 56 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 30, 1998* Prague ATP 250 R32 Clay Renzo Furlan #193 0-6 6-1 6-2 Cedric Pioline #13 Match data
Aug 27, 1994* Long Island ATP 250 SF Hard Cedric Pioline #18 4-6 7-6(4) 6-0 Renzo Furlan #46 Match data
May 6, 1992* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Renzo Furlan #63 6-2 6-3 Cedric Pioline #57 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Renzo Furlan #1,479 #19 1,235 1,844 209 231 47.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Renzo Furlan Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1989 3–5 37.5% #222 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1990 9–8 52.9% #77 1,597 0 0 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1991 22–26 45.8% #52 1,664 0 0 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1992 24–28 46.2% #53 1,667 0 0 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1993 26–28 48.1% #72 1,681 0 0 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1994 30–27 52.6% #41 1,682 0 2 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1995 37–31 54.4% #29 1,727 0 2 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 1996 29–26 52.7% #40 1,695 0 2 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 1997 18–27 40.0% #100 1,580 0 2 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 1998 2–8 20.0% #144 1,514 0 2 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 1999 3–5 37.5% #225 1,542 0 2 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 2000 3–4 42.9% #236 1,569 0 2 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 2001 1–1 50.0% #190 1,554 0 2 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 2002 1–3 25.0% #186 1,540 0 2 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 2003 1–4 20.0% #194 1,548 0 2 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5