H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Renzo Furlan vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 0-1
Hyung-Taik Lee holds a 1–0 lead over Renzo Furlan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hyung-Taik Lee leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2000 Brighton quarterfinal 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2000* | Brighton | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Hyung-Taik Lee | 6-1 6-3 | Renzo Furlan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renzo Furlan | #1,479 | #19 | 1,235 | 1,844 | 209 | 231 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Renzo Furlan | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #222 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #77 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #52 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #41 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 37–31 | 54.4% | #29 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #40 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #144 | 1,514 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #225 | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #236 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,540 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #194 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |