H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Renzo Furlan vs Jaime Oncins H2H: 2-2

Renzo Furlan and Jaime Oncins are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jaime Oncins leads 2–1 on clay, while Renzo Furlan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Renzo Furlan won the 1994 San Jose round of 16 7-6(4) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Renzo Furlan
ITA Age 56 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Jaime Oncins
BRA Age 56 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Renzo Furlan #69 7-6(4) 6-3 Jaime Oncins #133 Match data Feb 4, 1994* R16 San Jose ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Renzo Furlan #60 6-4 7-5 Jaime Oncins #66 Match data Sep 30, 1993* R32 Palermo ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Jaime Oncins #62 6-2 7-5 Renzo Furlan #46 Match data Jun 18, 1992* R32 Genova ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Jaime Oncins #87 6-2 6-4 Renzo Furlan #76 Match data May 24, 1992* F Bologna ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Renzo Furlan #1,479 #19 1,235 1,864 214 233 47.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Jaime Oncins #1,034 #34 773 1,810 64 87 42.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Renzo Furlan Jaime Oncins
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1988 1–2 33.3% #314 1,493 0 0
19 1989 3–5 37.5% #222 1,500 0 0 1989 0–2 0.0% #263 1,470 0 0
20 1990 9–8 52.9% #77 1,597 0 0 1990 0–4 0.0% #113 1,442 0 0
21 1991 22–26 45.8% #52 1,664 0 0 1991 22–17 56.4% #64 1,677 0 0
22 1992 26–29 47.3% #53 1,682 0 0 1992 27–19 58.7% #48 1,778 0 2
23 1993 26–28 48.1% #72 1,682 0 0 1993 11–23 32.4% #133 1,584 0 2
24 1994 30–27 52.6% #41 1,665 0 2 1994 1–7 12.5% #230 1,505 0 2
25 1995 37–31 54.4% #29 1,729 0 2 1995 1–2 33.3% #222 1,508 0 2
26 1996 32–27 54.2% #40 1,706 0 2 1996 0–2 0.0% #160 1,491 0 2
27 1997 18–27 40.0% #100 1,581 0 2 1997 0–6 0.0% #166 1,439 0 2
28 1998 2–8 20.0% #144 1,514 0 2 1998 1–2 33.3% #223 1,451 0 2
29 1999 3–5 37.5% #225 1,542 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2000 3–4 42.9% #236 1,569 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2001 1–1 50.0% #190 1,554 0 2 2001 0–1 0.0% #1031 1,438 0 2
32 2002 1–3 25.0% #186 1,540 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2003 1–4 20.0% #194 1,547 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Renzo Furlan Jaime Oncins
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1990 — — — — 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — — 1990 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1991 1 7 8 12.5% 20 17 37 54.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 13 10 23 56.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
22 1992 0 7 7 0.0% 25 20 45 55.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 12 11 23 52.2% 15 8 23 65.2% — — — — — — — —
23 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 23 21 44 52.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 4 7 11 36.4% 7 15 22 31.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1994 10 7 17 58.8% 17 16 33 51.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1994 1 2 3 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1995 17 10 27 63.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1995 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 1996 17 13 30 56.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1997 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1999 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2000 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2001 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 55 68 123 44.7% 127 128 255 49.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 29 31 60 48.3% — 32 42 74 43.2% 30 39 69 43.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 351/422 of Renzo Furlan's and 125/142 of Jaime Oncins's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Renzo Furlan Jaime Oncins
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 1991 43/48 1.4 1.2 62.8% 62.2% 48.8% 50.4% 49.3% 57.0% 42.8% 1991 35/39 3.2 2.6 55.4% 69.9% 50.1% 49.9% 43.4% 61.0% 41.7%
22 1992 44/55 1.9 0.9 62.9% 62.7% 49.8% 53.1% 47.2% 58.0% 43.1% 1992 42/46 3.0 3.8 55.5% 69.7% 45.7% 54.9% 43.5% 59.3% 42.8%
23 1993 46/54 2.4 1.5 58.4% 66.3% 50.5% 53.8% 44.3% 59.5% 39.9% 1993 29/34 2.9 4.4 58.2% 66.6% 40.7% 51.5% 42.1% 55.8% 40.6%
24 1994 49/57 2.9 1.5 57.4% 67.6% 49.6% 48.4% 49.0% 59.8% 41.8% 1994 6/8 2.2 9.0 57.5% 65.4% 40.9% 63.4% 41.9% 55.0% 39.7%
25 1995 57/68 3.4 1.9 57.4% 69.3% 50.5% 56.3% 46.0% 61.1% 38.3% 1995 3/3 3.0 5.3 60.8% 70.0% 43.9% 63.0% 24.5% 59.4% 39.6%
26 1996 46/59 3.9 1.7 61.2% 69.4% 51.0% 57.8% 42.8% 62.2% 38.8% 1996 2/2 1.5 18.5 45.0% 69.3% 28.9% 47.3% 28.6% 47.0% 43.5%
27 1997 36/45 5.5 3.3 53.3% 74.5% 49.7% 60.0% 40.7% 62.5% 36.8% 1997 6/6 3.0 9.7 51.8% 67.9% 35.1% 48.8% 61.9% 52.0% 35.0%
28 1998 7/10 7.0 3.3 50.2% 71.6% 43.1% 58.8% 35.2% 57.1% 32.8% 1998 1/3 4.0 8.0 57.7% 66.7% 31.8% 33.3% 33.3% 51.9% 35.1%
29 1999 6/8 2.2 2.7 55.0% 60.1% 37.9% 53.7% 26.4% 50.3% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2000 6/7 3.8 2.2 56.0% 65.0% 54.5% 66.4% 42.1% 60.2% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2001 2/2 2.0 2.0 49.9% 73.7% 46.4% 36.7% 41.7% 60.0% 35.2% 2001 1/1 3.0 13.0 56.5% 63.9% 46.8% 60.0% 50.0% 56.5% 39.3%
32 2002 4/4 1.5 2.8 57.6% 66.1% 50.3% 50.7% 69.8% 59.3% 33.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2003 5/5 3.4 1.2 60.8% 64.4% 57.8% 49.2% 37.6% 61.8% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 351/447 3.1 1.7 58.8% 67.2% 49.8% 54.2% 45.3% 59.8% 39.7% — 125/151 3.0 4.5 56.0% 68.7% 44.6% 52.8% 43.3% 58.1% 41.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Renzo Furlan Jaime Oncins
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1493 95.3 — — — — +23 — — 42.9% -1.86 0–1 3–0 (100%) — +0.30
19 1989 1501 106.7 — — — — — +10 — 35.0% -0.45 2–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.66 1989 1471 95.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.19
20 1990 1598 130.3 — — — — — +44 — 50.0% -0.03 3–1 (75%) 2–3 (40%) 102.7 -0.03 1990 1442 102.8 — — — — +19 — — 20.0% -2.00 0–2 — — -0.15
21 1991 1664 137.7 -2.73 +1.94 0.994 49.8% -177 +91 — 47.1% -0.41 8–12 (40%) 12–4 (75%) 105.4 +0.30 1991 1677 121.5 +0.13 +1.64 1.068 51.1% -83 -50 -66 55.6% +0.24 5–9 (36%) 5–4 (56%) 98.5 +1.89
22 1992 1682 140.0 -1.77 +2.85 1.025 50.4% -235 +91 — 47.4% +0.01 8–10 (44%) 3–8 (27%) 96.1 -0.67 1992 1778 131.6 -1.02 +2.52 1.052 50.9% -123 +21 — 58.1% +0.28 7–7 (50%) 11–3 (79%) 105.8 +1.08
23 1993 1683 138.8 -0.24 +0.57 0.985 49.6% -226 +82 — 48.0% -0.09 7–8 (47%) 7–7 (50%) 98.6 +0.10 1993 1584 130.7 -3.35 +1.16 0.920 48.2% +18 +63 — 39.3% -0.56 5–11 (31%) 2–9 (18%) 89.5 -0.21
24 1994 1665 140.9 -0.31 +2.54 1.038 50.5% -28 +39 — 48.9% +0.01 13–10 (57%) 11–9 (55%) 105.7 +0.67 1994 1506 104.0 -2.79 -0.18 0.883 47.5% +74 +44 — 36.4% -0.86 0–6 (0%) 0–2 — +0.29
25 1995 1729 142.6 -0.32 +0.37 0.982 49.7% +21 -5 — 51.8% +0.17 14–3 (82%) 9–14 (39%) 105.7 +0.88 1995 1509 108.4 +0.94 -0.26 0.977 49.5% — +44 — 33.3% -0.50 — — — -0.02
26 1996 1706 139.0 +0.16 +1.18 1.029 50.3% -16 +54 -123 51.0% +0.01 14–7 (67%) 11–11 (50%) 105.1 -0.21 1996 1491 108.9 +1.07 +2.59 0.821 45.2% — — — 28.6% -2.14 0–1 1–1 — -0.08
27 1997 1582 130.5 +0.90 -1.60 0.981 49.4% +41 +103 — 42.6% -0.40 9–10 (47%) 14–12 (54%) 100.5 +1.02 1997 1439 112.1 -3.40 -1.77 0.729 43.8% +88 +85 — 13.3% -1.93 0–1 0–2 — -0.45
28 1998 1514 109.9 -1.66 -1.48 0.763 46.0% +69 +109 — 32.1% -1.21 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — +0.35 1998 1451 107.4 -1.60 -1.30 0.730 43.1% +85 — — 33.3% -1.17 — 1–1 — -0.07
29 1999 1542 115.4 -3.93 -1.08 0.680 42.1% — +87 — 33.3% -1.83 2–0 3–0 (100%) — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2000 1569 111.4 -1.39 -1.97 0.838 47.4% +18 +59 — 41.2% -0.94 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2001 1555 106.0 -2.11 +1.56 0.881 47.7% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.18 2001 1438 100.2 +0.01 -0.73 0.903 49.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
32 2002 1540 109.9 -1.86 -0.38 0.813 46.7% — — — 33.3% -0.56 0–1 1–1 — +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2003 1548 103.2 -1.68 -0.29 0.984 49.5% +59 — — 10.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1865 140.8 -0.75 +0.99 0.987 49.7% -29 +67 -123 47.0% -0.18 84–67 (56%) 74–76 (49%) 104.6 +0.77 — 1810 127.5 -1.35 +1.50 0.987 49.6% -49 +28 -66 47.0% -0.28 17–39 (30%) 23–23 (50%) 90.4 +1.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.