H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Renzo Furlan vs John Van Lottum H2H: 0-1

John Van Lottum holds a 1–0 lead over Renzo Furlan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, John Van Lottum leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, John Van Lottum won the 1997 Wimbledon round of 64 6-3 6-3 6-3.

ITA Age 56 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
NED Age 50 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
John Van Lottum 6-3 6-3 6-3 Renzo Furlan #68 Match data Jun 27, 1997* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Renzo Furlan #1,479 #19 1,235 1,864 214 233 47.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
John Van Lottum 1,719 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Renzo Furlan John Van Lottum
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1989 3–5 37.5% #222 1,500 0 0
20 1990 9–8 52.9% #77 1,597 0 0
21 1991 22–26 45.8% #52 1,664 0 0
22 1992 26–29 47.3% #53 1,682 0 0
23 1993 26–28 48.1% #72 1,682 0 0
24 1994 30–27 52.6% #41 1,665 0 2
25 1995 37–31 54.4% #29 1,729 0 2
26 1996 32–27 54.2% #40 1,706 0 2
27 1997 18–27 40.0% #100 1,581 0 2
28 1998 2–8 20.0% #144 1,514 0 2
29 1999 3–5 37.5% #225 1,542 0 2
30 2000 3–4 42.9% #236 1,569 0 2
31 2001 1–1 50.0% #190 1,554 0 2
32 2002 1–3 25.0% #186 1,540 0 2
33 2003 1–4 20.0% #194 1,547 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Renzo Furlan John Van Lottum
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1989 3 5 8 37.5%
20 1990 9 8 17 52.9% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1991 1 7 8 12.5% 20 17 37 54.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1992 0 7 7 0.0% 25 20 45 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 3 6 9 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
23 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 23 21 44 52.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 17 13 30 56.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 1994 10 7 17 58.8% 17 16 33 51.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2000 2 8 10 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1995 17 10 27 63.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1996 17 13 30 56.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 2002 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
27 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2004 2 6 8 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 1999 3 5 8 37.5%
30 2000 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2006 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2001 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 55 68 123 44.7% 127 128 255 49.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 29 31 60 48.3% 30 46 76 39.5% 13 27 40 32.5% 13 15 28 46.4% 4 7 11 36.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 351/422 of Renzo Furlan's and 41/41 of John Van Lottum's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Renzo Furlan John Van Lottum
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 1991 43/48 1.4 1.2 62.8% 62.2% 48.8% 50.4% 49.3% 57.0% 42.8% —/—
22 1992 44/55 1.9 0.9 62.9% 62.7% 49.8% 53.1% 47.2% 58.0% 43.1% —/—
23 1993 46/54 2.4 1.5 58.4% 66.3% 50.5% 53.8% 44.3% 59.5% 39.9% —/—
24 1994 49/57 2.9 1.5 57.4% 67.6% 49.6% 48.4% 49.0% 59.8% 41.8% —/—
25 1995 57/68 3.4 1.9 57.4% 69.3% 50.5% 56.3% 46.0% 61.1% 38.3% —/—
26 1996 46/59 3.9 1.7 61.2% 69.4% 51.0% 57.8% 42.8% 62.2% 38.8% —/—
27 1997 36/45 5.5 3.3 53.3% 74.5% 49.7% 60.0% 40.7% 62.5% 36.8% 2003 24/24 3.8 4.0 55.8% 69.8% 48.0% 59.5% 55.2% 60.3% 36.2%
28 1998 7/10 7.0 3.3 50.2% 71.6% 43.1% 58.8% 35.2% 57.1% 32.8% 2004 16/16 3.8 3.1 58.5% 68.9% 49.0% 60.1% 34.7% 60.5% 32.1%
29 1999 6/8 2.2 2.7 55.0% 60.1% 37.9% 53.7% 26.4% 50.3% 33.8% —/—
30 2000 6/7 3.8 2.2 56.0% 65.0% 54.5% 66.4% 42.1% 60.2% 33.3% 2006 1/1 4.0 2.0 51.3% 64.1% 54.1% 66.7% 25.0% 59.2% 30.6%
31 2001 2/2 2.0 2.0 49.9% 73.7% 46.4% 36.7% 41.7% 60.0% 35.2% —/—
32 2002 4/4 1.5 2.8 57.6% 66.1% 50.3% 50.7% 69.8% 59.3% 33.1% —/—
33 2003 5/5 3.4 1.2 60.8% 64.4% 57.8% 49.2% 37.6% 61.8% 37.5% —/—

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Renzo Furlan John Van Lottum
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1989 1501 106.7 +10 35.0% -0.45 2–0 0–3 (0%) +0.66
20 1990 1598 130.3 +44 50.0% -0.03 3–1 (75%) 2–3 (40%) 102.7 -0.03 1996 1491 106.9 0.0% -3.75 -0.35
21 1991 1664 137.7 -2.73 +1.94 0.994 49.8% -177 +91 47.1% -0.41 8–12 (40%) 12–4 (75%) 105.4 +0.30 1997 1631 121.6 -56 -46 +18 64.5% +0.77 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 100.2 -0.05
22 1992 1682 140.0 -1.77 +2.85 1.025 50.4% -235 +91 47.4% +0.01 8–10 (44%) 3–8 (27%) 96.1 -0.66 1998 1612 120.7 -50 -79 +129 40.7% -0.59 5–3 (63%) 3–7 (30%) 101.6 +0.05
23 1993 1683 138.8 -0.24 +0.57 0.985 49.6% -226 +82 48.0% -0.09 7–8 (47%) 7–7 (50%) 98.6 +0.10 1999 1662 128.3 +36 -181 +3 49.1% -0.33 6–6 (50%) 13–3 (81%) 107.6 +1.68
24 1994 1665 140.9 -0.31 +2.54 1.038 50.5% -28 +39 48.9% +0.01 13–10 (57%) 11–9 (55%) 105.7 +0.67 2000 1517 104.0 +57 18.5% -2.33 0–2 0–2 +0.38
25 1995 1729 142.6 -0.32 +0.37 0.982 49.7% +21 -5 51.8% +0.17 14–3 (82%) 9–14 (39%) 105.7 +0.88 2001 1584 111.2 20.0% -2.87 0–1 1–1 -0.48
26 1996 1706 139.0 +0.16 +1.18 1.029 50.3% -16 +54 -123 51.0% +0.01 14–7 (67%) 11–11 (50%) 105.1 -0.21 2002 1624 118.0 -2 -68 50.0% -0.30 0–1 1–1 +0.19
27 1997 1582 130.5 +0.90 -1.60 0.981 49.4% +41 +103 42.6% -0.40 9–10 (47%) 14–12 (54%) 100.5 +1.02 2003 1599 123.9 -1.54 -1.36 0.912 48.4% -3 +14 -27 46.7% -0.27 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 101.1 +0.37
28 1998 1514 109.9 -1.66 -1.48 0.763 46.0% +69 +109 32.1% -1.21 2–4 (33%) 0–2 +0.35 2004 1512 123.3 -1.67 -2.93 0.813 47.0% +60 +41 +27 37.5% -1.07 0–6 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 96.3 -0.92
29 1999 1542 115.4 -3.93 -1.08 0.680 42.1% +87 33.3% -1.83 2–0 3–0 (100%) -0.45
30 2000 1569 111.4 -1.39 -1.97 0.838 47.4% +18 +59 41.2% -0.94 2–1 (67%) 1–1 +0.23 2006 1511 103.1 +0.34 +3.36 0.751 46.4% 0.0% -2.00 0–1 -0.12
31 2001 1555 106.0 -2.11 +1.56 0.881 47.7% 50.0% -0.25 +0.18
32 2002 1540 109.9 -1.86 -0.38 0.813 46.7% 33.3% -0.56 0–1 1–1 +0.32
33 2003 1548 103.2 -1.68 -0.29 0.984 49.5% +59 10.0% -2.50 0–1 +0.07
Career 1865 140.8 -0.75 +0.99 0.987 49.7% -29 +67 -123 47.0% -0.18 84–67 (56%) 74–76 (49%) 104.6 +0.77 1719 126.6 -1.54 -1.86 0.869 47.8% +15 -52 +48 43.0% -0.64 15–25 (38%) 27–20 (57%) 100.9 +0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.