H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Renzo Furlan vs Karim Alami H2H: 2-1
Renzo Furlan holds a 2–1 lead over Karim Alami in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Renzo Furlan leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Karim Alami won the 2000 San Marino fourth round 4-6 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
MAR
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2000* | San Marino | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Karim Alami | 4-6 6-1 6-3 | Renzo Furlan | Match data |
| Apr 17, 1996* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Renzo Furlan | 6-4 6-7(3) 6-3 | Karim Alami | Match data |
| Mar 20, 1994* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Renzo Furlan | 6-2 6-2 | Karim Alami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renzo Furlan | #1,479 | #19 | 1,235 | 1,844 | 209 | 231 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Karim Alami | #1,418 | #25 | 1,196 | 1,798 | 140 | 177 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Renzo Furlan | Karim Alami | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #222 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #77 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #52 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #73 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #56 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1994 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #41 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #55 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1995 | 37–31 | 54.4% | #29 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #72 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1996 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #40 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #144 | 1,514 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #203 | 1,512 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #225 | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #479 | 1,523 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #236 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #990 | 1,510 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,540 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #194 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |