H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Renzo Furlan vs Kelly Evernden H2H: 0-1
Kelly Evernden holds a 1–0 lead over Renzo Furlan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kelly Evernden leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kelly Evernden won the 1992 Auckland third round 7-6(4) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NZL
Age 64
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 1992* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Kelly Evernden | 7-6(4) 7-5 | Renzo Furlan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renzo Furlan | #1,479 | #19 | 1,235 | 1,844 | 209 | 231 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kelly Evernden | #1,218 | #31 | 535 | 1,853 | 121 | 129 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Renzo Furlan | Kelly Evernden | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #403 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #222 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1990 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #77 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #52 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #576 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1993 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #86 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #41 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #289 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 37–31 | 54.4% | #29 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #36 | 1,793 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1996 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #40 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #119 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #38 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #144 | 1,514 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #97 | 1,615 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #225 | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #193 | 1,512 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #236 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #207 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #447 | 1,580 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,540 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1198 | 1,570 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #194 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |