H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Renzo Furlan vs Mats Wilander H2H: 1-0
Renzo Furlan holds a 1–0 lead over Mats Wilander in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Renzo Furlan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Renzo Furlan won the 1995 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 1995* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Renzo Furlan | 6-4 7-6(4) | Mats Wilander | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renzo Furlan | #1,479 | #19 | 1,235 | 1,844 | 209 | 231 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mats Wilander | #1,354 | #1 | 1,075 | 2,262 | 526 | 203 | 72.2% | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 33 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Renzo Furlan | Mats Wilander | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #283 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #73 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 56–16 | 77.8% | #8 | 2,020 | 1 | 4 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 71–11 | 86.6% | #4 | 2,246 | 2 | 13 |
| 19 | 1989 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #222 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 49–12 | 80.3% | #4 | 2,177 | 3 | 16 |
| 20 | 1990 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #77 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #3 | 2,108 | 4 | 19 |
| 21 | 1991 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #52 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #3 | 2,056 | 4 | 21 |
| 22 | 1992 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #3 | 2,082 | 4 | 26 |
| 23 | 1993 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 51–9 | 85.0% | #1 | 2,152 | 7 | 32 |
| 24 | 1994 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #41 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #12 | 1,922 | 7 | 32 |
| 25 | 1995 | 37–31 | 54.4% | #29 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #41 | 1,894 | 7 | 33 |
| 26 | 1996 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #40 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #159 | 1,767 | 7 | 33 |
| 27 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #144 | 1,514 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #330 | 1,695 | 7 | 33 |
| 29 | 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #225 | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #129 | 1,652 | 7 | 33 |
| 30 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #236 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #46 | 1,766 | 7 | 33 |
| 31 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #196 | 1,679 | 7 | 33 |
| 32 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,540 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #194 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |