H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Renzo Furlan vs Yannick Noah H2H: 0-1

Yannick Noah holds a 1–0 lead over Renzo Furlan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yannick Noah leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Yannick Noah won the 1991 Hamburg Open round of 16 1-6 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Renzo Furlan
ITA Age 56 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Yannick Noah
FRA Age 66 Right-Handed 194 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Yannick Noah #153 1-6 6-4 6-3 Renzo Furlan #61 Match data May 11, 1991* R16 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Renzo Furlan #1,479 #19 1,235 1,864 214 233 47.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Yannick Noah #1,303 #3 1,079 2,199 456 194 70.2% 1 0 0 1 21 23

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Renzo Furlan Yannick Noah
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1977 0–1 0.0% #269 1,491 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1978 23–14 62.2% #49 1,708 0 2
19 1989 3–5 37.5% #222 1,500 0 0 1979 34–14 70.8% #26 1,933 0 5
20 1990 9–8 52.9% #77 1,597 0 0 1980 29–16 64.4% #18 1,890 0 5
21 1991 22–26 45.8% #52 1,664 0 0 1981 51–18 73.9% #13 1,917 0 7
22 1992 26–29 47.3% #53 1,682 0 0 1982 50–12 80.6% #10 2,086 0 11
23 1993 26–28 48.1% #72 1,682 0 0 1983 36–9 80.0% #5 2,087 1 14
24 1994 30–27 52.6% #41 1,665 0 2 1984 23–10 69.7% #9 1,997 1 14
25 1995 37–31 54.4% #29 1,729 0 2 1985 50–17 74.6% #7 1,956 1 17
26 1996 32–27 54.2% #40 1,706 0 2 1986 43–14 75.4% #4 2,012 1 19
27 1997 18–27 40.0% #100 1,581 0 2 1987 34–13 72.3% #8 1,951 1 21
28 1998 2–8 20.0% #144 1,514 0 2 1988 32–10 76.2% #12 1,948 1 22
29 1999 3–5 37.5% #225 1,542 0 2 1989 21–14 60.0% #16 1,876 1 22
30 2000 3–4 42.9% #236 1,569 0 2 1990 22–21 51.2% #40 1,708 1 23
31 2001 1–1 50.0% #190 1,554 0 2 1991 7–7 50.0% #188 1,708 1 23
32 2002 1–3 25.0% #186 1,540 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2003 1–4 20.0% #194 1,547 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — 1995 1–3 25.0% #552 1,686 1 23
36 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,672 1 23

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Renzo Furlan Yannick Noah
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1989 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 1979 13 5 18 72.2% 16 4 20 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
20 1990 — — — — 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — — 1980 11 5 16 68.8% 14 5 19 73.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9%
21 1991 1 7 8 12.5% 20 17 37 54.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1981 10 6 16 62.5% 22 6 28 78.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 18 4 22 81.8%
22 1992 0 7 7 0.0% 25 20 45 55.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1982 19 1 20 95.0% 29 7 36 80.6% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 23 21 44 52.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 9 4 13 69.2% 23 2 25 92.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
24 1994 10 7 17 58.8% 17 16 33 51.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1984 9 3 12 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 1995 17 10 27 63.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1985 21 7 28 75.0% 20 4 24 83.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3%
26 1996 17 13 30 56.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1986 15 5 20 75.0% 17 3 20 85.0% — — — — 11 6 17 64.7%
27 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1987 13 2 15 86.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7%
28 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1988 9 3 12 75.0% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 9 2 11 81.8%
29 1999 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 1989 16 8 24 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
30 2000 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1990 16 7 23 69.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
31 2001 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
32 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 55 68 123 44.7% 127 128 255 49.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 29 31 60 48.3% — 164 62 226 72.6% 202 66 268 75.4% 11 16 27 40.7% 79 50 129 61.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 351/422 of Renzo Furlan's and 18/19 of Yannick Noah's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Renzo Furlan Yannick Noah
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 1991 43/48 1.4 1.2 62.8% 62.2% 48.8% 50.4% 49.3% 57.0% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1992 44/55 1.9 0.9 62.9% 62.7% 49.8% 53.1% 47.2% 58.0% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1993 46/54 2.4 1.5 58.4% 66.3% 50.5% 53.8% 44.3% 59.5% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1994 49/57 2.9 1.5 57.4% 67.6% 49.6% 48.4% 49.0% 59.8% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1995 57/68 3.4 1.9 57.4% 69.3% 50.5% 56.3% 46.0% 61.1% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1996 46/59 3.9 1.7 61.2% 69.4% 51.0% 57.8% 42.8% 62.2% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1997 36/45 5.5 3.3 53.3% 74.5% 49.7% 60.0% 40.7% 62.5% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1998 7/10 7.0 3.3 50.2% 71.6% 43.1% 58.8% 35.2% 57.1% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1999 6/8 2.2 2.7 55.0% 60.1% 37.9% 53.7% 26.4% 50.3% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2000 6/7 3.8 2.2 56.0% 65.0% 54.5% 66.4% 42.1% 60.2% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2001 2/2 2.0 2.0 49.9% 73.7% 46.4% 36.7% 41.7% 60.0% 35.2% 1991 13/14 4.5 3.5 55.5% 68.0% 44.8% 62.6% 47.2% 57.6% 36.6%
32 2002 4/4 1.5 2.8 57.6% 66.1% 50.3% 50.7% 69.8% 59.3% 33.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2003 5/5 3.4 1.2 60.8% 64.4% 57.8% 49.2% 37.6% 61.8% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 4/4 4.0 1.8 55.4% 77.9% 47.6% 45.5% 20.0% 64.1% 29.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 1/1 7.0 2.0 60.5% 69.2% 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% 61.6% 19.4%
Career — 351/447 3.1 1.7 58.8% 67.2% 49.8% 54.2% 45.3% 59.8% 39.7% — 18/650 4.6 3.1 55.8% 70.2% 45.7% 58.1% 44.1% 59.2% 34.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Renzo Furlan Yannick Noah
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1491 103.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -2.00 0–1 2–0 — -0.08
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1709 137.9 — — — — -111 +56 -173 57.7% +0.42 7–5 (58%) 10–6 (63%) 105.7 +3.56
19 1989 1501 106.7 — — — — — +10 — 35.0% -0.45 2–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.66 1979 1933 150.7 — — — — -105 +27 -371 65.1% +1.08 9–4 (69%) 10–9 (53%) 105.8 +0.67
20 1990 1598 130.3 — — — — — +44 — 50.0% -0.03 3–1 (75%) 2–3 (40%) 102.7 -0.03 1980 1890 153.0 — — — — +5 +91 -340 59.5% +0.98 9–6 (60%) 6–8 (43%) 97.9 -3.05
21 1991 1664 137.7 -2.73 +1.94 0.994 49.8% -177 +91 — 47.1% -0.41 8–12 (40%) 12–4 (75%) 105.4 +0.30 1981 1917 156.5 — — — — +62 +116 -384 64.4% +1.04 17–4 (81%) 9–12 (43%) 104.8 -1.67
22 1992 1682 140.0 -1.77 +2.85 1.025 50.4% -235 +91 — 47.4% +0.01 8–10 (44%) 3–8 (27%) 96.1 -0.67 1982 2086 164.7 — — — — -20 +30 — 74.0% +1.55 12–5 (71%) 9–6 (60%) 104.2 -3.56
23 1993 1683 138.8 -0.24 +0.57 0.985 49.6% -226 +82 — 48.0% -0.09 7–8 (47%) 7–7 (50%) 98.6 +0.10 1983 2087 162.3 — — — — -135 +184 — 74.8% +1.72 7–6 (54%) 8–4 (67%) 98.9 -1.85
24 1994 1665 140.9 -0.31 +2.54 1.038 50.5% -28 +39 — 48.9% +0.01 13–10 (57%) 11–9 (55%) 105.7 +0.67 1984 1998 159.6 — — — — -11 +206 — 65.9% +0.83 8–5 (62%) 9–3 (75%) 100.8 -2.14
25 1995 1729 142.6 -0.32 +0.37 0.982 49.7% +21 -5 — 51.8% +0.17 14–3 (82%) 9–14 (39%) 105.7 +0.88 1985 1957 156.2 — — — — -10 +205 -368 68.4% +1.11 12–6 (67%) 18–12 (60%) 100.2 -0.87
26 1996 1706 139.0 +0.16 +1.18 1.029 50.3% -16 +54 -123 51.0% +0.01 14–7 (67%) 11–11 (50%) 105.1 -0.21 1986 2013 163.9 — — — — -41 +208 — 67.8% +1.19 13–5 (72%) 12–17 (41%) 99.8 -2.21
27 1997 1582 130.5 +0.90 -1.60 0.981 49.4% +41 +103 — 42.6% -0.40 9–10 (47%) 14–12 (54%) 100.5 +1.02 1987 1951 147.7 — — — — +93 +140 -296 65.0% +1.00 11–4 (73%) 8–9 (47%) 99.7 +1.55
28 1998 1514 109.9 -1.66 -1.48 0.763 46.0% +69 +109 — 32.1% -1.21 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — +0.35 1988 1949 153.8 — — — — +75 +116 — 67.2% +1.03 12–4 (75%) 15–11 (58%) 99.1 -0.74
29 1999 1542 115.4 -3.93 -1.08 0.680 42.1% — +87 — 33.3% -1.83 2–0 3–0 (100%) — -0.45 1989 1877 147.3 — — — — +46 — — 56.2% +0.40 10–4 (71%) 10–12 (45%) 98.9 -0.89
30 2000 1569 111.4 -1.39 -1.97 0.838 47.4% +18 +59 — 41.2% -0.94 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.23 1990 1708 139.1 — — — — +109 +162 — 49.1% -0.16 8–6 (57%) 10–9 (53%) 95.3 -1.00
31 2001 1555 106.0 -2.11 +1.56 0.881 47.7% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.18 1991 1709 127.3 -0.35 -2.54 0.863 47.8% +60 +151 — 48.5% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — -0.03
32 2002 1540 109.9 -1.86 -0.38 0.813 46.7% — — — 33.3% -0.56 0–1 1–1 — +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2003 1548 103.2 -1.68 -0.29 0.984 49.5% +59 — — 10.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1686 117.0 -0.18 -0.05 0.814 46.1% +61 — — 25.0% -1.38 — 1–1 — -0.54
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1672 104.2 -2.25 +2.64 0.506 43.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.10
Career — 1865 140.8 -0.75 +0.99 0.987 49.7% -29 +67 -123 47.0% -0.18 84–67 (56%) 74–76 (49%) 104.6 +0.77 — 2199 161.2 -0.42 -1.70 0.835 47.2% +9 +121 -314 64.2% +0.93 138–68 (67%) 139–119 (54%) 101.7 -2.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.