H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Ricardas Berankis vs Aljaz Bedene H2H: 1-0

Ricardas Berankis holds a 1–0 lead over Aljaz Bedene in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ricardas Berankis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ricardas Berankis won the 2018 Moscow round of 16 3-6 7-6(3) 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ricardas Berankis
Lithuania Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Aljaz Bedene
SLO Age 37 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ricardas Berankis #107 3-6 7-6(3) 7-6(5) Aljaz Bedene #72 Match data Oct 19, 2018* R16 Moscow ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ricardas Berankis #435 #50 909 1,831 104 146 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Aljaz Bedene #1,030 #43 1,169 1,893 131 160 45.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ricardas Berankis Aljaz Bedene
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2008 0–2 0.0% #455 1,535 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2010 4–3 57.1% #87 1,698 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2011 6–10 37.5% #125 1,679 0 0 2011 1–1 50.0% #165 1,598 0 0
22 2012 10–5 66.7% #113 1,772 0 0 2012 3–4 42.9% #86 1,627 0 0
23 2013 11–16 40.7% #131 1,656 0 0 2013 11–18 37.9% #95 1,631 0 0
24 2014 6–7 46.2% #86 1,732 0 0 2014 5–9 35.7% #145 1,671 0 0
25 2015 12–18 40.0% #85 1,716 0 0 2015 17–17 50.0% #45 1,777 0 0
26 2016 8–15 34.8% #92 1,670 0 0 2016 12–19 38.7% #101 1,740 0 0
27 2017 6–7 46.2% #136 1,696 0 0 2017 19–18 51.4% #49 1,816 0 0
28 2018 7–15 31.8% #116 1,679 0 0 2018 17–19 47.2% #67 1,733 0 0
29 2019 7–12 36.8% #66 1,709 0 0 2019 18–18 50.0% #58 1,844 0 0
30 2020 7–7 50.0% #69 1,777 0 0 2020 10–12 45.5% #58 1,798 0 0
31 2021 13–18 41.9% #104 1,707 0 0 2021 15–15 50.0% #109 1,773 0 0
32 2022 7–10 41.2% #168 1,659 0 0 2022 3–10 23.1% #347 1,660 0 0
33 2023 0–1 0.0% #238 1,643 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ricardas Berankis Aljaz Bedene
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2008 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — — — — — 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2012 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2012 2 1 3 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
23 2013 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 2013 4 8 12 33.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2014 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2015 11 10 21 52.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2015 10 10 20 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2016 8 10 18 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2016 6 8 14 42.9% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2017 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 6 10 16 37.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
28 2018 6 12 18 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2018 2 7 9 22.2% 14 9 23 60.9% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 2019 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2019 8 7 15 53.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2020 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2020 8 11 19 42.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
31 2021 9 10 19 47.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2021 6 5 11 54.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
32 2022 6 6 12 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2022 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
33 2023 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 89 99 188 47.3% 10 28 38 26.3% 5 19 24 20.8% — 57 74 131 43.5% 61 64 125 48.8% 13 22 35 37.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 248/250 of Ricardas Berankis's and 290/291 of Aljaz Bedene's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ricardas Berankis Aljaz Bedene
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2008 2/2 1.5 3.5 45.9% 61.8% 40.9% 31.4% 8.3% 51.2% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 7/7 9.6 6.6 53.1% 75.9% 54.6% 47.3% 43.2% 65.8% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 16/16 6.3 4.3 50.9% 72.8% 48.4% 57.9% 47.4% 61.0% 37.0% 2011 2/2 9.0 2.5 60.2% 81.9% 49.2% 42.9% 33.3% 69.0% 28.3%
22 2012 15/15 4.5 3.3 49.1% 76.1% 55.9% 57.6% 30.0% 65.7% 37.9% 2012 7/7 5.6 3.6 56.4% 71.7% 41.5% 62.9% 49.7% 57.7% 34.3%
23 2013 27/27 6.1 4.5 55.0% 72.6% 53.3% 64.4% 34.9% 63.8% 35.7% 2013 29/29 7.9 3.7 57.4% 72.6% 50.5% 49.4% 43.5% 62.9% 36.7%
24 2014 13/13 2.8 1.6 56.8% 71.0% 50.0% 51.6% 29.0% 61.8% 36.1% 2014 14/14 8.8 3.1 53.1% 71.5% 45.5% 45.9% 48.1% 59.5% 33.9%
25 2015 30/30 5.4 3.8 57.5% 73.1% 54.7% 64.4% 46.4% 65.2% 34.4% 2015 34/34 8.1 2.9 54.0% 76.1% 48.8% 58.9% 43.1% 63.5% 35.6%
26 2016 22/23 3.0 3.3 57.5% 66.7% 49.4% 53.7% 41.4% 59.3% 37.0% 2016 31/31 9.1 2.9 57.4% 73.7% 49.6% 55.2% 42.1% 63.3% 35.5%
27 2017 12/13 3.1 2.8 56.8% 65.4% 52.0% 52.8% 43.0% 59.5% 35.4% 2017 37/37 7.9 2.0 59.3% 73.4% 52.1% 55.4% 40.6% 64.8% 36.3%
28 2018 22/22 4.6 3.4 59.6% 69.9% 49.4% 59.5% 46.4% 61.2% 31.7% 2018 36/36 8.1 2.2 57.6% 72.3% 49.3% 59.6% 32.0% 62.3% 37.5%
29 2019 19/19 3.7 3.2 58.3% 67.8% 52.3% 54.7% 43.6% 61.4% 36.1% 2019 35/36 9.4 3.2 57.1% 74.2% 49.1% 59.0% 45.0% 63.9% 35.1%
30 2020 14/14 4.4 3.5 59.9% 70.1% 50.2% 56.2% 40.6% 61.9% 37.3% 2020 22/22 9.4 3.7 56.7% 77.7% 45.9% 56.2% 31.1% 64.3% 30.5%
31 2021 31/31 2.7 2.8 60.6% 68.7% 48.3% 57.3% 38.5% 60.8% 37.5% 2021 30/30 8.2 3.6 54.2% 75.6% 50.8% 54.9% 41.8% 64.1% 36.6%
32 2022 17/17 2.4 2.6 60.5% 69.3% 49.1% 49.3% 43.6% 61.3% 33.5% 2022 13/13 8.7 4.8 54.8% 72.7% 45.1% 58.4% 39.4% 60.0% 32.5%
33 2023 1/1 5.0 3.0 59.1% 66.7% 40.7% 40.0% 0.0% 56.1% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 248/250 4.3 3.4 57.0% 70.4% 51.1% 57.0% 40.4% 62.1% 35.7% — 290/291 8.4 3.0 56.5% 74.1% 49.1% 55.9% 40.7% 63.2% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ricardas Berankis Aljaz Bedene
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2008 1536 110.1 -0.85 -3.54 0.646 41.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1519 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 1698 127.4 +0.74 -0.38 1.048 51.2% -45 — — 54.2% +0.67 1–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.08 2010 1510 96.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 1679 131.2 -1.17 +1.02 0.948 49.2% -17 — — 43.2% -0.68 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 94.5 -0.45 2011 1598 111.4 -3.13 +1.53 0.912 49.2% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.14
22 2012 1772 131.1 +1.42 +0.64 1.106 51.1% +4 — — 58.6% +0.21 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.0 +0.30 2012 1628 112.4 -0.63 -2.09 0.811 46.5% +15 -14 — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.05
23 2013 1656 132.6 -0.15 -0.33 0.985 49.7% +45 -87 -52 45.8% -0.19 3–7 (30%) 7–6 (54%) 95.3 -0.35 2013 1631 135.7 -0.57 -0.46 0.989 49.7% -24 +25 -80 43.4% -0.46 3–9 (25%) 5–4 (56%) 98.7 -0.37
24 2014 1733 127.5 -1.09 +0.05 0.943 48.6% +16 -28 — 37.9% -0.62 3–1 (75%) 2–3 (40%) 101.8 -0.15 2014 1671 125.5 -2.62 -1.76 0.838 46.8% +7 +10 — 29.4% -1.21 4–2 (67%) 1–5 (17%) 99.9 -0.18
25 2015 1716 139.0 +0.12 -1.22 0.990 50.1% +31 -109 -82 43.9% -0.39 4–10 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 94.2 +0.66 2015 1777 143.0 -0.50 -0.29 0.974 49.4% +5 -47 -158 45.2% -0.30 7–2 (78%) 9–5 (64%) 110.1 -0.03
26 2016 1670 128.7 -2.73 +0.24 0.911 48.1% +60 — -131 35.5% -0.94 5–4 (56%) 4–7 (36%) 100.1 +1.16 2016 1740 139.8 -0.05 -0.03 0.968 49.2% +1 -8 -110 41.0% -0.41 6–8 (43%) 10–7 (59%) 99.1 +0.06
27 2017 1697 129.0 -1.63 -1.47 0.873 47.4% +59 — — 39.4% -0.73 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +0.35 2017 1816 141.4 +0.23 +0.59 1.031 49.9% -96 -15 -84 50.6% +0.28 7–4 (64%) 6–9 (40%) 103.5 +0.31
28 2018 1679 132.8 -2.24 -3.20 0.818 46.8% +25 — -162 30.8% -1.08 5–2 (71%) 5–10 (33%) 101.2 -0.96 2018 1733 146.7 -0.98 +1.27 0.996 49.7% -89 +112 -31 46.8% -0.17 9–9 (50%) 9–9 (50%) 98.2 -1.19
29 2019 1710 139.9 -1.07 +0.48 0.935 48.9% +10 — — 44.4% -0.67 2–7 (22%) 8–2 (80%) 100.5 -0.84 2019 1844 145.1 +0.02 -0.45 0.970 49.6% -71 -22 -134 51.6% -0.02 6–7 (46%) 11–10 (52%) 101.2 -0.41
30 2020 1777 136.9 -0.68 -0.02 0.978 49.6% -12 — — 51.2% -0.02 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) 98.7 +0.72 2020 1799 141.8 +0.66 -2.51 0.855 47.5% -20 +2 — 46.3% -0.15 4–1 (80%) 2–7 (22%) 98.8 -0.46
31 2021 1708 131.1 -1.85 +0.30 0.957 49.4% -6 -89 — 44.6% -0.36 1–4 (20%) 7–3 (70%) 100.7 +1.01 2021 1774 129.1 +0.73 -0.73 1.019 50.0% -1 -14 -65 49.4% -0.03 5–4 (56%) 9–7 (56%) 100.8 -0.98
32 2022 1660 130.7 -1.63 -0.82 0.866 47.8% +26 -78 — 39.5% -0.84 2–0 3–1 (75%) — -0.60 2022 1661 118.5 -2.51 -2.70 0.811 46.8% +31 +88 — 36.6% -0.76 1–5 (17%) 2–4 (33%) 93.6 +0.07
33 2023 1644 105.8 -0.30 +0.53 0.706 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1831 139.3 -1.02 -0.43 0.940 48.9% +19 -82 -105 42.7% -0.50 35–47 (43%) 56–57 (50%) 98.9 +0.29 — 1893 144.0 -0.36 -0.42 0.960 49.1% -29 +18 -94 45.4% -0.25 53–52 (50%) 66–68 (49%) 101.6 -1.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.