H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 07:16 UTC
Ricardas Berankis vs Andy Roddick H2H: 0-1
Andy Roddick holds a 1–0 lead over Ricardas Berankis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andy Roddick leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andy Roddick won the 2011 Memphis third round 4-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Lithuania
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2011* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Andy Roddick | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Ricardas Berankis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricardas Berankis | #435 | #50 | 909 | 1,830 | 104 | 145 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Andy Roddick | #40 | #1 | 5,800 | 2,177 | 577 | 196 | 74.6% | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 22 | 32 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ricardas Berankis | Andy Roddick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #156 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #455 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,923 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 2010 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #87 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 71–18 | 79.8% | #1 | 2,092 | 1 | 11 |
| 21 | 2011 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #125 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #2 | 2,078 | 1 | 15 |
| 22 | 2012 | 10–5 | 66.7% | #113 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,031 | 1 | 20 |
| 23 | 2013 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #131 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #6 | 1,998 | 1 | 21 |
| 24 | 2014 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #86 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 48–16 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,009 | 1 | 23 |
| 25 | 2015 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,008 | 1 | 26 |
| 26 | 2016 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #92 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #7 | 2,046 | 1 | 27 |
| 27 | 2017 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #136 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 1 | 29 |
| 28 | 2018 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #116 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,024 | 1 | 30 |
| 29 | 2019 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #66 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #39 | 1,987 | 1 | 32 |
| 30 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #104 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #238 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |