H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Ricardas Berankis vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 0-1
Ernests Gulbis holds a 1–0 lead over Ricardas Berankis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ernests Gulbis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ernests Gulbis won the 2016 Geneva third round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Lithuania
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
LAT
Age 37
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2016* | Geneva | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ernests Gulbis | 7-5 7-5 | Ricardas Berankis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricardas Berankis | #435 | #50 | 909 | 1,830 | 104 | 145 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ernests Gulbis | #893 | #10 | 2,725 | 2,139 | 221 | 232 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ricardas Berankis | Ernests Gulbis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #141 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #455 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #61 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #87 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #90 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #125 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #24 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2012 | 10–5 | 66.7% | #113 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2013 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #131 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #136 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2014 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #86 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #24 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2015 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #13 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2016 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #92 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #81 | 1,765 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2017 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #136 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,785 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2018 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #116 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #199 | 1,716 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2019 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #66 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #95 | 1,813 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #226 | 1,533 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2021 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #104 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,562 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,509 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #238 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |