H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Ricardas Berankis vs Igor Andreev H2H: 1-0
Ricardas Berankis holds a 1–0 lead over Igor Andreev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ricardas Berankis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ricardas Berankis won the 2012 Los Angeles fourth round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Lithuania
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2012* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Ricardas Berankis | 6-4 7-5 | Igor Andreev | Match data |
| Jan 10, 2011 | Sydney | ATP 250 | Q2 | Hard | Igor Andreev | 6-4 7-6(6) | Ricardas Berankis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricardas Berankis | #435 | #50 | 909 | 1,830 | 104 | 145 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Igor Andreev | #1,011 | #18 | 2,490 | 1,913 | 219 | 214 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ricardas Berankis | Igor Andreev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #455 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #87 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #50 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #125 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2012 | 10–5 | 66.7% | #113 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2013 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #131 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2014 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #86 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2015 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 27–30 | 47.4% | #35 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2016 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #92 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #79 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2017 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #136 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2018 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #116 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2019 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #66 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #104 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #238 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |