H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Ricardas Berankis vs James Ward

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Ricardas Berankis vs James Ward.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ricardas Berankis
Lithuania Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
James Ward
GBR Age 39 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ricardas Berankis #149 7-5 6-3 James Ward #179 Match data Feb 18, 2014* Q3 Q Marseille ATP 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ricardas Berankis #435 #50 909 1,831 104 146 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
James Ward #1,096 #89 573 1,716 15 50 23.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ricardas Berankis James Ward
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2008 0–2 0.0% #455 1,535 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2010 4–3 57.1% #87 1,698 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #558 1,472 0 0
21 2011 6–10 37.5% #125 1,679 0 0 2008 0–2 0.0% #280 1,480 0 0
22 2012 10–5 66.7% #113 1,772 0 0 2009 1–3 25.0% #270 1,468 0 0
23 2013 11–16 40.7% #131 1,656 0 0 2010 2–4 33.3% #201 1,523 0 0
24 2014 6–7 46.2% #86 1,732 0 0 2011 4–4 50.0% #162 1,535 0 0
25 2015 12–18 40.0% #85 1,716 0 0 2012 1–4 20.0% #250 1,516 0 0
26 2016 8–15 34.8% #92 1,670 0 0 2013 0–3 0.0% #161 1,553 0 0
27 2017 6–7 46.2% #136 1,696 0 0 2014 4–10 28.6% #107 1,685 0 0
28 2018 7–15 31.8% #116 1,679 0 0 2015 3–10 23.1% #156 1,574 0 0
29 2019 7–12 36.8% #66 1,709 0 0 2016 0–3 0.0% #444 1,509 0 0
30 2020 7–7 50.0% #69 1,777 0 0 2017 0–2 0.0% #843 1,492 0 0
31 2021 13–18 41.9% #104 1,707 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2022 7–10 41.2% #168 1,659 0 0 2019 0–3 0.0% #318 1,513 0 0
33 2023 0–1 0.0% #238 1,643 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — 2021 0–1 0.0% #391 1,524 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ricardas Berankis James Ward
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2008 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2011 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2012 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
23 2013 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2014 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
25 2015 11 10 21 52.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2016 8 10 18 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2013 — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
27 2017 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2018 6 12 18 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2015 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2019 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2016 — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
30 2020 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2017 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
31 2021 9 10 19 47.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 6 6 12 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2019 — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
33 2023 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 89 99 188 47.3% 10 28 38 26.3% 5 19 24 20.8% — 4 16 20 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 11 31 42 26.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 248/250 of Ricardas Berankis's and 65/65 of James Ward's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ricardas Berankis James Ward
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2008 2/2 1.5 3.5 45.9% 61.8% 40.9% 31.4% 8.3% 51.2% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 7/7 9.6 6.6 53.1% 75.9% 54.6% 47.3% 43.2% 65.8% 35.8% 2007 1/1 2.0 2.0 56.3% 63.0% 57.1% 16.7% 37.5% 60.4% 40.2%
21 2011 16/16 6.3 4.3 50.9% 72.8% 48.4% 57.9% 47.4% 61.0% 37.0% 2008 2/2 3.5 4.5 55.0% 65.1% 52.0% 50.0% 33.3% 59.7% 31.3%
22 2012 15/15 4.5 3.3 49.1% 76.1% 55.9% 57.6% 30.0% 65.7% 37.9% 2009 4/4 6.8 3.5 51.1% 78.5% 47.6% 54.9% 28.0% 63.5% 31.1%
23 2013 27/27 6.1 4.5 55.0% 72.6% 53.3% 64.4% 34.9% 63.8% 35.7% 2010 6/6 4.7 3.5 58.7% 71.5% 41.9% 64.2% 36.8% 59.5% 33.4%
24 2014 13/13 2.8 1.6 56.8% 71.0% 50.0% 51.6% 29.0% 61.8% 36.1% 2011 8/8 7.8 4.1 60.9% 74.7% 53.1% 65.6% 33.7% 66.1% 33.1%
25 2015 30/30 5.4 3.8 57.5% 73.1% 54.7% 64.4% 46.4% 65.2% 34.4% 2012 5/5 10.2 2.8 59.7% 69.5% 49.2% 55.9% 35.4% 61.7% 33.4%
26 2016 22/23 3.0 3.3 57.5% 66.7% 49.4% 53.7% 41.4% 59.3% 37.0% 2013 3/3 11.0 2.7 65.1% 72.5% 51.7% 59.8% 11.5% 65.3% 30.8%
27 2017 12/13 3.1 2.8 56.8% 65.4% 52.0% 52.8% 43.0% 59.5% 35.4% 2014 14/14 4.0 2.1 65.1% 66.0% 50.0% 55.1% 36.0% 60.3% 32.0%
28 2018 22/22 4.6 3.4 59.6% 69.9% 49.4% 59.5% 46.4% 61.2% 31.7% 2015 13/13 9.5 3.8 58.7% 73.4% 49.0% 65.5% 36.9% 63.3% 34.6%
29 2019 19/19 3.7 3.2 58.3% 67.8% 52.3% 54.7% 43.6% 61.4% 36.1% 2016 3/3 9.0 4.3 56.6% 69.5% 44.5% 44.4% 30.6% 58.6% 27.0%
30 2020 14/14 4.4 3.5 59.9% 70.1% 50.2% 56.2% 40.6% 61.9% 37.3% 2017 2/2 4.5 1.5 59.1% 67.2% 48.7% 46.7% — 59.1% 26.3%
31 2021 31/31 2.7 2.8 60.6% 68.7% 48.3% 57.3% 38.5% 60.8% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 17/17 2.4 2.6 60.5% 69.3% 49.1% 49.3% 43.6% 61.3% 33.5% 2019 3/3 8.7 4.7 59.3% 67.8% 47.0% 54.4% 32.6% 59.3% 39.2%
33 2023 1/1 5.0 3.0 59.1% 66.7% 40.7% 40.0% 0.0% 56.1% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 1/1 3.0 5.0 62.1% 73.2% 40.0% 33.3% 0.0% 60.6% 18.0%
Career — 248/250 4.3 3.4 57.0% 70.4% 51.1% 57.0% 40.4% 62.1% 35.7% — 65/65 7.0 3.3 60.1% 70.7% 48.9% 57.7% 32.2% 61.9% 32.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ricardas Berankis James Ward
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2008 1536 110.1 -0.85 -3.54 0.646 41.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1519 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 1698 127.4 +0.74 -0.38 1.048 51.2% -45 — — 54.2% +0.67 1–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.08 2007 1473 98.1 -1.20 -0.01 1.015 48.9% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.15
21 2011 1679 131.2 -1.17 +1.02 0.948 49.2% -17 — — 43.2% -0.68 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.45 2008 1480 99.9 -0.72 -0.98 0.777 44.8% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.16
22 2012 1772 131.1 +1.42 +0.64 1.106 51.1% +4 — — 58.6% +0.21 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.30 2009 1468 104.0 +0.38 -0.97 0.853 47.3% — — +101 22.2% -1.33 — 0–1 — -0.20
23 2013 1656 132.6 -0.15 -0.33 0.985 49.7% +45 -87 -52 45.8% -0.19 3–7 (30%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.35 2010 1524 108.7 -1.53 -0.51 0.823 46.5% — — +70 27.3% -1.91 0–1 1–0 — -0.21
24 2014 1733 127.5 -1.09 +0.05 0.943 48.6% +16 -28 — 37.9% -0.62 3–1 (75%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.15 2011 1536 110.4 +0.86 -0.34 0.979 49.6% — — +128 45.0% -0.25 2–1 (67%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.34
25 2015 1716 139.0 +0.12 -1.22 0.990 50.1% +31 -109 -82 43.9% -0.39 4–10 (29%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.66 2012 1517 111.3 -0.28 -2.44 0.872 47.1% — — +91 36.8% -0.68 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.13
26 2016 1670 128.7 -2.73 +0.24 0.911 48.1% +60 — -131 35.5% -0.94 5–4 (56%) 4–7 (36%) — +1.16 2013 1553 108.8 +0.68 +0.03 0.888 47.7% — — -15 22.2% -1.00 0–1 2–4 (33%) — -0.15
27 2017 1697 129.0 -1.63 -1.47 0.873 47.4% +59 — — 39.4% -0.73 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +0.35 2014 1685 125.6 -1.96 -2.94 0.807 46.3% -11 — -162 29.4% -1.50 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.26
28 2018 1679 132.8 -2.24 -3.20 0.818 46.8% +25 — -162 30.8% -1.08 5–2 (71%) 5–10 (33%) — -0.96 2015 1575 118.0 -1.54 -0.18 0.942 49.0% -30 — -6 40.5% -0.50 0–7 (0%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.50
29 2019 1710 139.9 -1.07 +0.48 0.935 48.9% +10 — — 44.4% -0.67 2–7 (22%) 8–2 (80%) — -0.84 2016 1510 108.6 -0.43 +0.71 0.652 43.7% — — +38 12.5% -2.12 0–1 0–1 — -0.19
30 2020 1777 136.9 -0.68 -0.02 0.978 49.6% -12 — — 51.2% -0.02 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.72 2017 1492 100.2 -0.70 -1.02 0.644 42.9% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.04
31 2021 1708 131.1 -1.85 +0.30 0.957 49.4% -6 -89 — 44.6% -0.36 1–4 (20%) 7–3 (70%) — +1.01 2018 1495 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1660 130.7 -1.63 -0.82 0.866 47.8% +26 -78 — 39.5% -0.84 2–0 3–1 (75%) — -0.60 2019 1514 108.3 -0.11 -1.23 0.963 49.3% — — +65 36.4% -0.45 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.10
33 2023 1644 105.8 -0.30 +0.53 0.706 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1524 102.7 -3.97 -1.72 0.457 42.2% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.15
Career — 1831 139.3 -1.02 -0.43 0.940 48.9% +19 -82 -105 42.7% -0.50 35–47 (43%) 56–57 (50%) 98.9 +0.29 — 1716 116.3 -0.88 -1.12 0.856 47.3% -19 — +41 32.0% -1.05 5–22 (19%) 11–16 (41%) 87.9 -0.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.