H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Ricardas Berankis vs Nicolas Mahut H2H: 2-4

Nicolas Mahut holds a 4–2 lead over Ricardas Berankis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Nicolas Mahut leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Mahut won the 2016 Roland Garros first round 7-6(4) 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ricardas Berankis
Lithuania Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Nicolas Mahut
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 4, 2019 Montpellier ATP 250 Q1 Q Hard Nicolas Mahut #195 6-2 6-3 Ricardas Berankis #105 Match data
May 24, 2016* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Nicolas Mahut #44 7-6(4) 6-2 6-1 Ricardas Berankis #50 Match data
Feb 21, 2014* Marseille ATP 250 R16 Hard Nicolas Mahut #41 7-6(5) 6-3 Ricardas Berankis #149 Match data
Jun 19, 2013* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 R32 Grass Nicolas Mahut #240 6-1 6-4 Ricardas Berankis #69 Match data
Aug 2, 2012* Washington ATP 500 R32 Hard Ricardas Berankis #103 6-4 7-5 Nicolas Mahut #62 Match data
Jul 28, 2012* Los Angeles ATP 250 QF Hard Ricardas Berankis #141 6-4 6-4 Nicolas Mahut #66 Match data
Jul 21, 2011* Atlanta ATP 250 R32 Hard Nicolas Mahut #97 7-6(5) 6-2 Ricardas Berankis #115 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ricardas Berankis #435 #50 909 1,830 104 145 41.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nicolas Mahut #1,433 #37 1,122 1,926 179 224 44.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ricardas Berankis Nicolas Mahut
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2008 0–2 0.0% #455 1,535 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% #388 1,516 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2001 1–4 20.0% #216 1,498 0 0
20 2010 4–3 57.1% #87 1,699 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #269 1,445 0 0
21 2011 6–10 37.5% #125 1,679 0 0 2003 3–6 33.3% #94 1,538 0 0
22 2012 10–5 66.7% #113 1,771 0 0 2004 3–10 23.1% #131 1,545 0 0
23 2013 11–16 40.7% #131 1,655 0 0 2005 1–5 16.7% #134 1,467 0 0
24 2014 6–7 46.2% #86 1,722 0 0 2006 11–19 36.7% #66 1,581 0 0
25 2015 12–18 40.0% #85 1,714 0 0 2007 22–20 52.4% #45 1,732 0 0
26 2016 8–14 36.4% #92 1,675 0 0 2008 16–26 38.1% #94 1,644 0 0
27 2017 6–7 46.2% #136 1,720 0 0 2009 4–4 50.0% #214 1,633 0 0
28 2018 7–15 31.8% #116 1,684 0 0 2010 3–7 30.0% #132 1,662 0 0
29 2019 7–12 36.8% #66 1,726 0 0 2011 11–12 47.8% #80 1,765 0 0
30 2020 7–7 50.0% #69 1,785 0 0 2012 16–18 47.1% #108 1,754 0 0
31 2021 13–18 41.9% #104 1,710 0 0 2013 17–7 70.8% #50 1,851 0 2
32 2022 7–10 41.2% #168 1,661 0 0 2014 14–23 37.8% #117 1,666 0 2
33 2023 0–1 0.0% #238 1,645 0 0 2015 11–10 52.4% #71 1,767 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2016 23–20 53.5% #39 1,869 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2017 14–19 42.4% #103 1,753 0 4
36 — — — — — — — 2018 5–8 38.5% #190 1,707 0 4
37 — — — — — — — 2019 4–3 57.1% #194 1,707 0 4