H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Ricardas Berankis vs Nicolas Mahut H2H: 2-4

Nicolas Mahut holds a 4–2 lead over Ricardas Berankis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Nicolas Mahut leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Mahut won the 2016 Roland Garros first round 7-6(4) 6-2 6-1.

Lithuania Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 4
6 main draw meetings
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicolas Mahut #195 6-2 6-3 Ricardas Berankis #105 Match data Feb 4, 2019 Q1 Q Montpellier Open ATP 250 Hard
Nicolas Mahut #44 7-6(4) 6-2 6-1 Ricardas Berankis #50 Match data May 24, 2016* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Nicolas Mahut #41 7-6(5) 6-3 Ricardas Berankis #149 Match data Feb 21, 2014* R16 Marseille ATP 250 Hard
Nicolas Mahut #240 6-1 6-4 Ricardas Berankis #69 Match data Jun 19, 2013* R32 Libéma Open ATP 250 Grass
Ricardas Berankis #103 6-4 7-5 Nicolas Mahut #62 Match data Aug 2, 2012* R32 Washington Open ATP 500 Hard
Ricardas Berankis #141 6-4 6-4 Nicolas Mahut #66 Match data Jul 28, 2012* QF Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Hard
Nicolas Mahut #97 7-6(5) 6-2 Ricardas Berankis #115 Match data Jul 21, 2011* R32 Atlanta ATP 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ricardas Berankis #435 #50 909 1,831 104 146 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nicolas Mahut #1,433 #37 1,122 1,930 179 224 44.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ricardas Berankis Nicolas Mahut
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2008 0–2 0.0% #455 1,535 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% #388 1,517 0 0
19 2001 1–4 20.0% #216 1,500 0 0
20 2010 4–3 57.1% #87 1,698 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #269 1,446 0 0
21 2011 6–10 37.5% #125 1,679 0 0 2003 3–6 33.3% #94 1,539 0 0
22 2012 10–5 66.7% #113 1,772 0 0 2004 3–10 23.1% #131 1,545 0 0
23 2013 11–16 40.7% #131 1,656 0 0 2005 1–5 16.7% #134 1,467 0 0
24 2014 6–7 46.2% #86 1,732 0 0 2006 11–19 36.7% #66 1,581 0 0
25 2015 12–18 40.0% #85 1,716 0 0 2007 22–20 52.4% #45 1,732 0 0
26 2016 8–15 34.8% #92 1,670 0 0 2008 16–26 38.1% #94 1,645 0 0
27 2017 6–7 46.2% #136 1,696 0 0 2009 4–4 50.0% #214 1,634 0 0
28 2018 7–15 31.8% #116 1,679 0 0 2010 3–7 30.0% #132 1,663 0 0
29 2019 7–12 36.8% #66 1,709 0 0 2011 11–12 47.8% #80 1,776 0 0
30 2020 7–7 50.0% #69 1,777 0 0 2012 16–18 47.1% #108 1,757 0 0
31 2021 13–18 41.9% #104 1,707 0 0 2013 17–7 70.8% #50 1,852 0 2
32 2022 7–10 41.2% #168 1,659 0 0 2014 14–23 37.8% #117 1,664 0 2
33 2023 0–1 0.0% #238 1,643 0 0 2015 11–10 52.4% #71 1,767 0 3
34 2016 23–20 53.5% #39 1,871 0 4
35 2017 14–19 42.4% #103 1,754 0 4
36 2018 5–8 38.5% #190 1,708 0 4
37 2019 4–3 57.1% #194 1,707 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ricardas Berankis Nicolas Mahut
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2010 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2002 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2011 6 10 16 37.5% 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2012 10 5 15 66.7% 2004 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 2013 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 2005 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2014 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 2015 11 10 21 52.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2007 11 13 24 45.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 3 13 76.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2016 8 10 18 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2008 13 16 29 44.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2017 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
28 2018 6 12 18 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2010 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2019 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2011 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
30 2020 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2012 10 14 24 41.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
31 2021 9 10 19 47.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2013 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7%
32 2022 6 6 12 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
33 2023 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 3 8 11 27.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 1 7 85.7%
34 2016 13 14 27 48.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 2 10 80.0%
35 2017 12 11 23 52.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
36 2018 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
37 2019 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
Career 89 99 188 47.3% 10 28 38 26.3% 5 19 24 20.8% 92 133 225 40.9% 17 39 56 30.4% 67 41 108 62.0% 3 11 14 21.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 248/250 of Ricardas Berankis's and 401/403 of Nicolas Mahut's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ricardas Berankis Nicolas Mahut
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2008 2/2 1.5 3.5 45.9% 61.8% 40.9% 31.4% 8.3% 51.2% 31.5% 2000 2/2 2.5 3.5 54.1% 65.6% 50.0% 54.2% 34.3% 58.4% 30.7%
19 —/— 2001 5/5 9.0 4.0 63.3% 71.4% 45.1% 59.0% 24.9% 61.6% 31.0%
20 2010 7/7 9.6 6.6 53.1% 75.9% 54.6% 47.3% 43.2% 65.8% 35.8% 2002 1/1 10.0 0.0 59.2% 69.0% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0% 65.3% 32.4%
21 2011 16/16 6.3 4.3 50.9% 72.8% 48.4% 57.9% 47.4% 61.0% 37.0% 2003 9/9 9.4 5.2 58.3% 71.9% 49.0% 55.7% 32.7% 62.4% 33.9%
22 2012 15/15 4.5 3.3 49.1% 76.1% 55.9% 57.6% 30.0% 65.7% 37.9% 2004 12/13 7.8 5.1 58.7% 68.5% 42.4% 46.6% 44.2% 57.7% 34.2%
23 2013 27/27 6.1 4.5 55.0% 72.6% 53.3% 64.4% 34.9% 63.8% 35.7% 2005 6/6 7.7 3.3 60.0% 77.5% 44.7% 36.9% 32.6% 64.2% 26.7%
24 2014 13/13 2.8 1.6 56.8% 71.0% 50.0% 51.6% 29.0% 61.8% 36.1% 2006 30/30 7.9 3.4 62.2% 70.5% 48.4% 56.4% 45.6% 62.2% 31.6%
25 2015 30/30 5.4 3.8 57.5% 73.1% 54.7% 64.4% 46.4% 65.2% 34.4% 2007 42/42 7.8 4.9 57.0% 75.5% 52.0% 61.9% 42.1% 65.2% 33.9%
26 2016 22/23 3.0 3.3 57.5% 66.7% 49.4% 53.7% 41.4% 59.3% 37.0% 2008 42/42 9.0 4.2 61.9% 72.6% 49.2% 63.1% 38.8% 63.7% 31.5%
27 2017 12/13 3.1 2.8 56.8% 65.4% 52.0% 52.8% 43.0% 59.5% 35.4% 2009 8/8 9.0 2.6 62.3% 80.1% 50.1% 63.2% 40.7% 68.9% 35.2%
28 2018 22/22 4.6 3.4 59.6% 69.9% 49.4% 59.5% 46.4% 61.2% 31.7% 2010 10/10 17.8 5.1 64.7% 76.0% 49.3% 66.9% 52.9% 66.5% 29.4%
29 2019 19/19 3.7 3.2 58.3% 67.8% 52.3% 54.7% 43.6% 61.4% 36.1% 2011 22/23 7.3 3.7 59.9% 74.6% 52.0% 61.9% 35.6% 65.3% 37.6%
30 2020 14/14 4.4 3.5 59.9% 70.1% 50.2% 56.2% 40.6% 61.9% 37.3% 2012 34/34 8.0 2.7 60.4% 72.3% 50.5% 64.5% 39.6% 63.8% 32.9%
31 2021 31/31 2.7 2.8 60.6% 68.7% 48.3% 57.3% 38.5% 60.8% 37.5% 2013 24/24 8.5 3.3 59.3% 79.5% 54.2% 71.3% 42.4% 69.1% 39.1%
32 2022 17/17 2.4 2.6 60.5% 69.3% 49.1% 49.3% 43.6% 61.3% 33.5% 2014 37/37 7.7 3.4 60.8% 72.2% 49.9% 55.5% 38.3% 63.6% 33.2%
33 2023 1/1 5.0 3.0 59.1% 66.7% 40.7% 40.0% 0.0% 56.1% 31.0% 2015 21/21 7.4 2.9 62.7% 72.3% 46.6% 58.6% 40.6% 63.0% 36.2%
34 —/— 2016 43/43 5.3 2.6 60.7% 74.0% 50.5% 58.7% 53.5% 64.9% 35.4%
35 —/— 2017 33/33 6.5 2.8 61.3% 70.8% 52.4% 60.0% 33.8% 63.7% 33.7%
36 —/— 2018 13/13 4.3 3.4 61.0% 72.2% 48.5% 54.4% 39.0% 62.9% 34.0%
37 —/— 2019 7/7 7.1 2.7 59.4% 72.5% 55.1% 71.2% 36.9% 65.8% 34.2%
Career 248/250 4.3 3.4 57.0% 70.4% 51.1% 57.0% 40.4% 62.1% 35.7% 401/403 7.7 3.5 60.6% 73.3% 50.1% 60.0% 41.0% 64.2% 33.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ricardas Berankis Nicolas Mahut
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2008 1536 110.1 -0.85 -3.54 0.646 41.7% 0.0% -3.00 -0.08 2000 1518 106.3 -0.24 -1.50 0.740 45.8% 16.7% -1.50 0–1 +0.11
19 2009 1519 98.0 2001 1500 110.5 -0.73 -2.42 0.806 46.0% +14 31.3% -1.25 1–2 (33%) 1–1 -0.14
20 2010 1698 127.4 +0.74 -0.38 1.048 51.2% -45 54.2% +0.67 1–1 3–3 (50%) +0.08 2002 1447 95.7 -1.89 -0.35 0.934 45.8% 0.0% -2.50 +0.22
21 2011 1679 131.2 -1.17 +1.02 0.948 49.2% -17 43.2% -0.68 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) -0.45 2003 1540 115.6 +0.41 -1.30 0.903 48.1% +28 23.8% -1.38 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) -0.20
22 2012 1772 131.1 +1.42 +0.64 1.106 51.1% +4 58.6% +0.21 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) +0.30 2004 1545 109.2 -3.28 -1.51 0.808 46.2% +20 -80 +2 29.4% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) +0.16
23 2013 1656 132.6 -0.15 -0.33 0.985 49.7% +45 -87 -52 45.8% -0.19 3–7 (30%) 7–6 (54%) -0.35 2005 1468 108.5 -0.35 -3.57 0.745 46.3% +26 28.6% -1.00 0–2 0–2 +0.50
24 2014 1733 127.5 -1.09 +0.05 0.943 48.6% +16 -28 37.9% -0.62 3–1 (75%) 2–3 (40%) -0.15 2006 1582 128.9 +0.81 -3.33 0.835 47.0% -87 -146 +113 39.7% -0.46 3–1 (75%) 4–12 (25%) -1.54
25 2015 1716 139.0 +0.12 -1.22 0.990 50.1% +31 -109 -82 43.9% -0.39 4–10 (29%) 7–11 (39%) +0.66 2007 1733 136.0 +2.07 -1.43 0.975 49.5% -133 -232 +160 51.4% +0.10 7–7 (50%) 10–13 (43%) -1.38
26 2016 1670 128.7 -2.73 +0.24 0.911 48.1% +60 -131 35.5% -0.94 5–4 (56%) 4–7 (36%) +1.16 2008 1646 139.7 +0.72 -3.30 0.869 48.1% +10 -169 +149 38.0% -0.56 10–6 (63%) 7–18 (28%) -1.66
27 2017 1697 129.0 -1.63 -1.47 0.873 47.4% +59 39.4% -0.73 3–2 (60%) 1–0 +0.35 2009 1634 116.4 +1.22 +0.45 1.133 52.1% +194 52.6% +0.42 0–1 2–2 (50%) -0.02
28 2018 1679 132.8 -2.24 -3.20 0.818 46.8% +25 -162 30.8% -1.08 5–2 (71%) 5–10 (33%) -0.96 2010 1663 119.6 +0.80 -3.07 0.879 48.7% -81 +172 41.4% -0.41 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) -0.59
29 2019 1710 139.9 -1.07 +0.48 0.935 48.9% +10 44.4% -0.67 2–7 (22%) 8–2 (80%) -0.84 2011 1776 139.1 +1.77 +0.87 1.085 51.4% 0 -11 51.9% +0.54 2–2 (50%) 4–7 (36%) -0.18
30 2020 1777 136.9 -0.68 -0.02 0.978 49.6% -12 51.2% -0.02 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) +0.72 2012 1758 146.6 +0.71 -2.00 0.908 48.7% -26 -191 +12 47.3% -0.12 4–3 (57%) 9–8 (53%) -1.76
31 2021 1708 131.1 -1.85 +0.30 0.957 49.4% -6 -89 44.6% -0.36 1–4 (20%) 7–3 (70%) +1.01 2013 1853 136.9 +4.19 +0.90 1.267 53.8% -98 +138 67.3% +1.11 1–2 (33%) 6–7 (46%) +0.94
32 2022 1660 130.7 -1.63 -0.82 0.866 47.8% +26 -78 39.5% -0.84 2–0 3–1 (75%) -0.60 2014 1665 136.4 -0.71 -2.67 0.911 48.4% -1 -159 +232 40.9% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 9–12 (43%) +0.82
33 2023 1644 105.8 -0.30 +0.53 0.706 44.4% 0.0% -3.00 -0.12 2015 1767 136.4 -0.11 +0.13 0.976 49.7% -83 -165 +250 55.0% -0.22 2–5 (29%) 11–2 (85%) +0.49
34 2016 1872 149.7 +1.33 -0.93 1.009 50.1% -84 -256 +228 52.4% +0.15 7–4 (64%) 9–11 (45%) +1.44
35 2017 1754 138.7 +0.15 -2.13 0.929 49.1% +26 -152 +157 42.5% -0.46 6–7 (46%) 9–5 (64%) +0.80
36 2018 1708 129.0 -0.69 -0.86 0.916 48.2% +41 33.3% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) +0.03
37 2019 1707 120.2 +0.99 -0.41 1.000 50.7% -37 +125 54.5% +0.55 2–1 (67%) 2–6 (25%) +0.13
38 2020 1668 101.7
39 2021 1629 98.6
Career 1831 139.3 -1.02 -0.43 0.940 48.9% +19 -82 -105 42.7% -0.50 35–47 (43%) 56–57 (50%) 98.9 +0.29 1930 140.6 +0.77 -1.60 0.946 49.2% -34 -161 +146 45.4% -0.20 54–57 (49%) 90–120 (43%) 97.9 -0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.