H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Ricardas Berankis vs Sam Querrey H2H: 1-3

Sam Querrey holds a 3–1 lead over Ricardas Berankis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Sam Querrey leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Ricardas Berankis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ricardas Berankis won the 2022 Wimbledon first round 6-4 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ricardas Berankis
Lithuania Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Sam Querrey
USA Age 38 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ricardas Berankis #106 6-4 7-5 6-3 Sam Querrey #157 Match data Jun 29, 2022* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Sam Querrey #45 7-6(2) 4-6 6-4 6-4 Ricardas Berankis #69 Match data Jan 24, 2020* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Sam Querrey #29 6-3 6-4 Ricardas Berankis #126 Match data Aug 23, 2013* QF Winston-Salem Open ATP 250 Hard
Sam Querrey #57 6-0 6-2 Ricardas Berankis #141 Match data Jul 29, 2012* F Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ricardas Berankis #435 #50 909 1,831 104 146 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sam Querrey #529 #11 2,595 2,038 372 316 54.1% 0 0 0 2 8 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ricardas Berankis Sam Querrey
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2008 0–2 0.0% #455 1,535 0 0 2006 6–11 35.3% #130 1,541 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2007 19–22 46.3% #63 1,637 0 0
20 2010 4–3 57.1% #87 1,698 0 0 2008 28–24 53.8% #39 1,778 0 1
21 2011 6–10 37.5% #125 1,679 0 0 2009 39–22 63.9% #25 1,900 0 2
22 2012 10–5 66.7% #113 1,772 0 0 2010 35–21 62.5% #18 1,872 0 6
23 2013 11–16 40.7% #131 1,656 0 0 2011 12–13 48.0% #93 1,817 0 6
24 2014 6–7 46.2% #86 1,732 0 0 2012 37–24 60.7% #22 2,005 0 7
25 2015 12–18 40.0% #85 1,716 0 0 2013 25–21 54.3% #46 1,875 0 7
26 2016 8–15 34.8% #92 1,670 0 0 2014 26–20 56.5% #35 1,896 0 7
27 2017 6–7 46.2% #136 1,696 0 0 2015 20–24 45.5% #59 1,812 0 7
28 2018 7–15 31.8% #116 1,679 0 0 2016 28–23 54.9% #31 1,797 0 8
29 2019 7–12 36.8% #66 1,709 0 0 2017 35–20 63.6% #13 1,944 0 10
30 2020 7–7 50.0% #69 1,777 0 0 2018 21–22 48.8% #51 1,823 0 10
31 2021 13–18 41.9% #104 1,707 0 0 2019 24–17 58.5% #44 1,898 0 10
32 2022 7–10 41.2% #168 1,659 0 0 2020 3–6 33.3% #53 1,818 0 10
33 2023 0–1 0.0% #238 1,643 0 0 2021 10–16 38.5% #108 1,689 0 10
34 — — — — — — — 2022 4–10 28.6% #329 1,644 0 10

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ricardas Berankis Sam Querrey
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2008 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 18 14 32 56.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2010 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2008 23 16 39 59.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2011 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 30 14 44 68.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — —
22 2012 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 19 14 33 57.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
23 2013 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2011 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
24 2014 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 28 16 44 63.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — —
25 2015 11 10 21 52.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2013 21 14 35 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2016 8 10 18 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2014 16 14 30 53.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
27 2017 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 8 15 23 34.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
28 2018 6 12 18 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2016 16 14 30 53.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — —
29 2019 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2017 23 13 36 63.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
30 2020 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 16 16 32 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
31 2021 9 10 19 47.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2019 13 14 27 48.1% 3 1 4 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — —
32 2022 6 6 12 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2020 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2023 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2021 2 9 11 18.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
Career — 89 99 188 47.3% 10 28 38 26.3% 5 19 24 20.8% — — — — — 250 210 460 54.3% 44 57 101 43.6% 78 47 125 62.4% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 248/250 of Ricardas Berankis's and 684/688 of Sam Querrey's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ricardas Berankis Sam Querrey
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2008 2/2 1.5 3.5 45.9% 61.8% 40.9% 31.4% 8.3% 51.2% 31.5% 2006 17/17 11.4 3.2 57.2% 75.9% 49.8% 62.8% 42.9% 64.6% 34.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 41/41 12.4 3.2 56.6% 79.2% 48.3% 59.9% 39.4% 65.8% 33.9%
20 2010 7/7 9.6 6.6 53.1% 75.9% 54.6% 47.3% 43.2% 65.8% 35.8% 2008 51/52 10.2 3.2 59.1% 74.3% 49.1% 61.1% 41.2% 64.2% 35.5%
21 2011 16/16 6.3 4.3 50.9% 72.8% 48.4% 57.9% 47.4% 61.0% 37.0% 2009 61/61 11.8 3.0 59.4% 80.0% 53.4% 60.4% 44.4% 69.2% 36.2%
22 2012 15/15 4.5 3.3 49.1% 76.1% 55.9% 57.6% 30.0% 65.7% 37.9% 2010 56/56 12.3 3.4 61.5% 79.4% 50.9% 64.4% 45.2% 68.3% 35.1%
23 2013 27/27 6.1 4.5 55.0% 72.6% 53.3% 64.4% 34.9% 63.8% 35.7% 2011 25/25 8.9 3.2 59.6% 74.8% 51.2% 66.6% 31.2% 65.2% 34.4%
24 2014 13/13 2.8 1.6 56.8% 71.0% 50.0% 51.6% 29.0% 61.8% 36.1% 2012 61/61 11.6 3.9 57.6% 80.5% 51.1% 60.0% 42.0% 68.1% 36.0%
25 2015 30/30 5.4 3.8 57.5% 73.1% 54.7% 64.4% 46.4% 65.2% 34.4% 2013 45/46 12.8 3.6 59.6% 78.6% 48.7% 57.6% 35.7% 66.5% 33.6%
26 2016 22/23 3.0 3.3 57.5% 66.7% 49.4% 53.7% 41.4% 59.3% 37.0% 2014 45/46 14.4 2.8 60.5% 79.4% 51.9% 73.7% 41.8% 68.7% 33.8%
27 2017 12/13 3.1 2.8 56.8% 65.4% 52.0% 52.8% 43.0% 59.5% 35.4% 2015 44/44 13.8 3.6 59.5% 78.7% 54.4% 64.0% 37.1% 68.9% 33.7%
28 2018 22/22 4.6 3.4 59.6% 69.9% 49.4% 59.5% 46.4% 61.2% 31.7% 2016 51/51 13.1 3.1 58.6% 79.9% 52.3% 59.4% 39.6% 68.5% 33.4%
29 2019 19/19 3.7 3.2 58.3% 67.8% 52.3% 54.7% 43.6% 61.4% 36.1% 2017 55/55 13.5 3.2 57.1% 79.8% 51.8% 62.5% 49.5% 67.9% 37.0%
30 2020 14/14 4.4 3.5 59.9% 70.1% 50.2% 56.2% 40.6% 61.9% 37.3% 2018 43/43 14.3 3.7 58.2% 81.9% 51.7% 60.0% 41.2% 69.3% 34.2%
31 2021 31/31 2.7 2.8 60.6% 68.7% 48.3% 57.3% 38.5% 60.8% 37.5% 2019 41/41 16.8 4.0 62.1% 81.2% 49.4% 60.5% 33.2% 69.1% 33.8%
32 2022 17/17 2.4 2.6 60.5% 69.3% 49.1% 49.3% 43.6% 61.3% 33.5% 2020 9/9 16.8 3.6 60.3% 78.2% 50.8% 33.4% 31.7% 67.5% 31.1%
33 2023 1/1 5.0 3.0 59.1% 66.7% 40.7% 40.0% 0.0% 56.1% 31.0% 2021 25/26 15.2 5.2 56.8% 81.9% 47.7% 52.4% 33.2% 67.3% 30.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 14/14 12.4 4.7 58.3% 78.6% 46.1% 56.3% 26.6% 64.8% 29.4%
Career — 248/250 4.3 3.4 57.0% 70.4% 51.1% 57.0% 40.4% 62.1% 35.7% — 684/688 12.9 3.5 59.0% 79.2% 50.9% 61.3% 40.2% 67.6% 34.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ricardas Berankis Sam Querrey
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1490 99.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 1536 110.1 -0.85 -3.54 0.646 41.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.08 2006 1542 124.2 +1.62 -2.01 0.962 49.2% -13 — — 46.7% -0.31 1–7 (13%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.03
19 2009 1519 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1637 141.5 +2.16 -1.29 0.990 50.0% +50 -158 — 47.6% -0.08 6–8 (43%) 9–10 (47%) — +0.09
20 2010 1698 127.4 +0.74 -0.38 1.048 51.2% -45 — — 54.2% +0.67 1–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.08 2008 1779 145.5 +1.02 -0.70 0.993 50.1% +29 -209 -254 51.5% +0.04 11–8 (58%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.64
21 2011 1679 131.2 -1.17 +1.02 0.948 49.2% -17 — — 43.2% -0.68 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.45 2009 1900 149.0 +4.79 +0.01 1.176 52.3% +27 -361 -223 62.0% +0.61 8–11 (42%) 13–12 (52%) — +1.27
22 2012 1772 131.1 +1.42 +0.64 1.106 51.1% +4 — — 58.6% +0.21 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.30 2010 1873 152.2 +3.95 -0.55 1.108 51.9% +5 -250 +9 58.4% +0.58 13–11 (54%) 14–17 (45%) — +2.65
23 2013 1656 132.6 -0.15 -0.33 0.985 49.7% +45 -87 -52 45.8% -0.19 3–7 (30%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.35 2011 1817 141.7 +1.37 -1.06 0.989 49.9% +19 -173 +81 46.7% -0.10 3–4 (43%) 4–7 (36%) — +0.50
24 2014 1733 127.5 -1.09 +0.05 0.943 48.6% +16 -28 — 37.9% -0.62 3–1 (75%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.15 2012 2006 157.4 +4.09 +0.39 1.129 52.1% +3 -305 -92 57.8% +0.40 12–10 (55%) 20–13 (61%) — -0.61
25 2015 1716 139.0 +0.12 -1.22 0.990 50.1% +31 -109 -82 43.9% -0.39 4–10 (29%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.66 2013 1875 153.6 +2.58 -2.07 1.003 50.0% +71 -164 -51 50.0% -0.07 9–8 (53%) 15–15 (50%) — +0.18
26 2016 1670 128.7 -2.73 +0.24 0.911 48.1% +60 — -131 35.5% -0.94 5–4 (56%) 4–7 (36%) — +1.16 2014 1896 144.5 +3.69 -2.25 1.080 51.0% +17 -178 -23 56.4% +0.33 6–9 (40%) 12–12 (50%) — +0.27
27 2017 1697 129.0 -1.63 -1.47 0.873 47.4% +59 — — 39.4% -0.73 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +0.35 2015 1812 152.4 +3.52 -1.09 1.082 51.0% -39 -68 +110 46.7% -0.02 7–9 (44%) 13–18 (42%) — -2.68
28 2018 1679 132.8 -2.24 -3.20 0.818 46.8% +25 — -162 30.8% -1.08 5–2 (71%) 5–10 (33%) — -0.96 2016 1797 152.8 +4.13 -1.97 1.060 50.9% -38 -84 +223 56.0% +0.27 8–9 (47%) 18–16 (53%) — +1.80
29 2019 1710 139.9 -1.07 +0.48 0.935 48.9% +10 — — 44.4% -0.67 2–7 (22%) 8–2 (80%) — -0.84 2017 1945 161.8 +4.11 +1.06 1.153 52.3% -43 -192 +131 59.1% +0.70 11–6 (65%) 14–13 (52%) — +1.92
30 2020 1777 136.9 -0.68 -0.02 0.978 49.6% -12 — — 51.2% -0.02 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.72 2018 1823 152.3 +4.08 -0.93 1.114 51.7% -5 -127 +252 54.1% +0.58 6–11 (35%) 9–20 (31%) — +1.23
31 2021 1708 131.1 -1.85 +0.30 0.957 49.4% -6 -89 — 44.6% -0.36 1–4 (20%) 7–3 (70%) — +1.01 2019 1898 146.9 +4.59 -1.49 1.095 51.3% -82 -158 +201 55.6% +0.20 5–5 (50%) 18–15 (55%) — -0.90
32 2022 1660 130.7 -1.63 -0.82 0.866 47.8% +26 -78 — 39.5% -0.84 2–0 3–1 (75%) — -0.60 2020 1818 128.8 +2.33 -0.47 0.956 48.3% -33 — — 37.0% -0.67 1–1 4–3 (57%) — -0.60
33 2023 1644 105.8 -0.30 +0.53 0.706 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.12 2021 1690 124.0 +2.41 -3.84 0.926 48.7% -54 — +303 39.1% -0.53 3–5 (38%) 8–8 (50%) — -0.24
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1645 117.4 -0.20 -3.77 0.835 47.4% -72 — +250 28.6% -0.97 2–1 (67%) 2–7 (22%) — +0.03
Career — 1831 139.3 -1.02 -0.43 0.940 48.9% +19 -82 -105 42.7% -0.50 35–47 (43%) 56–57 (50%) 98.9 +0.29 — 2039 155.6 +3.33 -1.02 1.064 51.0% 0 -181 +77 53.2% +0.22 112–123 (48%) 184–198 (48%) 96.0 +0.81

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.