H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Ricardas Berankis vs Tatsuma Ito H2H: 0-1

Tatsuma Ito holds a 1–0 lead over Ricardas Berankis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tatsuma Ito leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tatsuma Ito won the 2015 Libéma Open first round 6-3 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ricardas Berankis
Lithuania Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Tatsuma Ito
JPN Age 38 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tatsuma Ito #106 6-3 7-6(4) Ricardas Berankis #93 Match data Jun 11, 2015* R32 Libéma Open ATP 250 Grass
Tatsuma Ito #129 5-7 4-6 6-3 7-5 6-0 Ricardas Berankis #139 Match data Jun 24, 2014* Q3 Q Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Tatsuma Ito #155 7-6(5) 6-1 Ricardas Berankis #131 Match data Dec 29, 2013 Q2 Q Brisbane International ATP 250 Hard

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ricardas Berankis #435 #50 909 1,831 104 146 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tatsuma Ito #1,822 #60 725 1,726 28 57 32.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ricardas Berankis Tatsuma Ito
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2008 0–2 0.0% #455 1,535 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2010 4–3 57.1% #87 1,698 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #313 1,460 0 0
21 2011 6–10 37.5% #125 1,679 0 0 2009 0–2 0.0% #210 1,483 0 0
22 2012 10–5 66.7% #113 1,772 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #183 1,491 0 0
23 2013 11–16 40.7% #131 1,656 0 0 2011 2–4 33.3% #122 1,513 0 0
24 2014 6–7 46.2% #86 1,732 0 0 2012 9–13 40.9% #79 1,634 0 0
25 2015 12–18 40.0% #85 1,716 0 0 2013 2–9 18.2% #155 1,617 0 0
26 2016 8–15 34.8% #92 1,670 0 0 2014 3–5 37.5% #93 1,660 0 0
27 2017 6–7 46.2% #136 1,696 0 0 2015 8–11 42.1% #119 1,677 0 0
28 2018 7–15 31.8% #116 1,679 0 0 2016 3–4 42.9% #171 1,671 0 0
29 2019 7–12 36.8% #66 1,709 0 0 2017 0–2 0.0% #153 1,625 0 0
30 2020 7–7 50.0% #69 1,777 0 0 2018 0–1 0.0% #148 1,590 0 0
31 2021 13–18 41.9% #104 1,707 0 0 2019 0–3 0.0% #147 1,586 0 0
32 2022 7–10 41.2% #168 1,659 0 0 2020 1–1 50.0% #186 1,583 0 0
33 2023 0–1 0.0% #238 1,643 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ricardas Berankis Tatsuma Ito
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2008 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2011 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2012 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2013 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 2011 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
24 2014 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9%
25 2015 11 10 21 52.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2013 2 7 9 22.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2016 8 10 18 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2014 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2017 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2018 6 12 18 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2016 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2019 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2020 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2018 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2021 9 10 19 47.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2019 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2022 6 6 12 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2020 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2023 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 89 99 188 47.3% 10 28 38 26.3% 5 19 24 20.8% — 19 41 60 31.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 12 20 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 248/250 of Ricardas Berankis's and 84/85 of Tatsuma Ito's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ricardas Berankis Tatsuma Ito
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2008 2/2 1.5 3.5 45.9% 61.8% 40.9% 31.4% 8.3% 51.2% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 7/7 9.6 6.6 53.1% 75.9% 54.6% 47.3% 43.2% 65.8% 35.8% 2008 1/1 2.0 4.0 61.5% 43.8% 45.0% 28.6% 20.0% 44.2% 37.3%
21 2011 16/16 6.3 4.3 50.9% 72.8% 48.4% 57.9% 47.4% 61.0% 37.0% 2009 2/2 3.5 3.0 55.7% 63.5% 30.4% 29.8% 75.0% 48.9% 33.3%
22 2012 15/15 4.5 3.3 49.1% 76.1% 55.9% 57.6% 30.0% 65.7% 37.9% 2010 1/1 3.0 2.0 49.2% 63.3% 48.4% 57.1% 33.3% 55.7% 25.5%
23 2013 27/27 6.1 4.5 55.0% 72.6% 53.3% 64.4% 34.9% 63.8% 35.7% 2011 6/6 3.5 3.7 55.2% 63.9% 48.4% 54.0% 24.4% 57.2% 28.9%
24 2014 13/13 2.8 1.6 56.8% 71.0% 50.0% 51.6% 29.0% 61.8% 36.1% 2012 21/22 4.0 3.5 56.3% 66.6% 50.9% 54.8% 40.0% 59.6% 36.5%
25 2015 30/30 5.4 3.8 57.5% 73.1% 54.7% 64.4% 46.4% 65.2% 34.4% 2013 11/11 3.7 3.6 56.7% 66.3% 46.9% 46.9% 38.1% 57.6% 32.9%
26 2016 22/23 3.0 3.3 57.5% 66.7% 49.4% 53.7% 41.4% 59.3% 37.0% 2014 8/8 5.9 3.6 61.4% 67.3% 49.6% 53.3% 41.7% 60.5% 34.2%
27 2017 12/13 3.1 2.8 56.8% 65.4% 52.0% 52.8% 43.0% 59.5% 35.4% 2015 19/19 4.1 2.4 60.5% 71.9% 46.6% 55.8% 30.3% 62.1% 35.4%
28 2018 22/22 4.6 3.4 59.6% 69.9% 49.4% 59.5% 46.4% 61.2% 31.7% 2016 7/7 4.1 3.3 61.9% 66.4% 54.6% 43.5% 71.3% 62.5% 35.8%
29 2019 19/19 3.7 3.2 58.3% 67.8% 52.3% 54.7% 43.6% 61.4% 36.1% 2017 2/2 1.5 3.5 60.9% 65.2% 51.0% 50.0% 16.7% 59.8% 25.5%
30 2020 14/14 4.4 3.5 59.9% 70.1% 50.2% 56.2% 40.6% 61.9% 37.3% 2018 1/1 4.0 6.0 53.3% 67.2% 51.8% 76.5% 38.5% 60.0% 42.6%
31 2021 31/31 2.7 2.8 60.6% 68.7% 48.3% 57.3% 38.5% 60.8% 37.5% 2019 3/3 4.3 4.3 55.4% 69.1% 44.1% 40.6% 26.3% 57.8% 36.5%
32 2022 17/17 2.4 2.6 60.5% 69.3% 49.1% 49.3% 43.6% 61.3% 33.5% 2020 2/2 7.5 2.5 70.2% 68.1% 43.8% 55.6% 36.4% 60.4% 29.7%
33 2023 1/1 5.0 3.0 59.1% 66.7% 40.7% 40.0% 0.0% 56.1% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 248/250 4.3 3.4 57.0% 70.4% 51.1% 57.0% 40.4% 62.1% 35.7% — 84/85 4.1 3.3 58.5% 67.3% 48.4% 51.6% 38.6% 59.5% 34.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ricardas Berankis Tatsuma Ito
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2008 1536 110.1 -0.85 -3.54 0.646 41.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1519 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1485 99.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 1698 127.4 +0.74 -0.38 1.048 51.2% -45 — — 54.2% +0.67 1–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.08 2008 1460 95.0 -3.59 -0.51 0.669 40.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.10
21 2011 1679 131.2 -1.17 +1.02 0.948 49.2% -17 — — 43.2% -0.68 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.45 2009 1483 102.7 -1.10 +0.91 0.651 40.8% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.23
22 2012 1772 131.1 +1.42 +0.64 1.106 51.1% +4 — — 58.6% +0.21 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.30 2010 1492 106.5 -1.95 +7.36 0.576 42.0% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.10
23 2013 1656 132.6 -0.15 -0.33 0.985 49.7% +45 -87 -52 45.8% -0.19 3–7 (30%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.35 2011 1513 111.0 -3.38 -2.91 0.676 43.8% +20 — — 33.3% -1.53 1–1 2–0 — 0.00
24 2014 1733 127.5 -1.09 +0.05 0.943 48.6% +16 -28 — 37.9% -0.62 3–1 (75%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.15 2012 1635 124.2 -2.45 -0.38 0.904 48.0% -2 -103 -65 39.7% -0.91 4–3 (57%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.56
25 2015 1716 139.0 +0.12 -1.22 0.990 50.1% +31 -109 -82 43.9% -0.39 4–10 (29%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.66 2013 1618 116.8 -4.05 -1.85 0.775 45.3% +28 — — 28.6% -1.75 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.28
26 2016 1670 128.7 -2.73 +0.24 0.911 48.1% +60 — -131 35.5% -0.94 5–4 (56%) 4–7 (36%) — +1.16 2014 1660 123.9 -2.82 -0.02 0.867 47.6% +12 — -29 37.5% -0.25 — 1–3 (25%) — +0.33
27 2017 1697 129.0 -1.63 -1.47 0.873 47.4% +59 — — 39.4% -0.73 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +0.35 2015 1677 125.3 -2.21 -0.52 0.934 48.3% -19 — +54 40.4% -0.68 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) — +1.59
28 2018 1679 132.8 -2.24 -3.20 0.818 46.8% +25 — -162 30.8% -1.08 5–2 (71%) 5–10 (33%) — -0.96 2016 1671 118.1 -0.69 +0.33 0.956 49.1% +7 — — 44.4% -0.45 1–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.05
29 2019 1710 139.9 -1.07 +0.48 0.935 48.9% +10 — — 44.4% -0.67 2–7 (22%) 8–2 (80%) — -0.84 2017 1626 112.5 -0.78 -3.10 0.634 44.1% — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 — — -0.06
30 2020 1777 136.9 -0.68 -0.02 0.978 49.6% -12 — — 51.2% -0.02 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.72 2018 1591 100.3 -1.04 -2.54 1.065 51.8% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 0–1 — -0.03
31 2021 1708 131.1 -1.85 +0.30 0.957 49.4% -6 -89 — 44.6% -0.36 1–4 (20%) 7–3 (70%) — +1.01 2019 1586 115.3 -1.04 -1.28 0.863 46.6% +47 — — 12.5% -1.88 0–1 0–1 — +0.29
32 2022 1660 130.7 -1.63 -0.82 0.866 47.8% +26 -78 — 39.5% -0.84 2–0 3–1 (75%) — -0.60 2020 1584 107.5 +1.82 +0.48 0.751 46.0% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.01
33 2023 1644 105.8 -0.30 +0.53 0.706 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.12 2021 1510 90.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1486 89.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1831 139.3 -1.02 -0.43 0.940 48.9% +19 -82 -105 42.7% -0.50 35–47 (43%) 56–57 (50%) 98.9 +0.29 — 1727 119.8 -2.33 -0.67 0.851 47.0% +6 -103 -18 35.4% -1.04 12–13 (48%) 17–14 (55%) 105.6 +3.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.