H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Ricardas Berankis vs Thomaz Bellucci
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Ricardas Berankis vs Thomaz Bellucci.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Lithuania
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricardas Berankis | #435 | #50 | 909 | 1,830 | 104 | 145 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thomaz Bellucci | #1,303 | #21 | 1,732 | 1,937 | 179 | 201 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ricardas Berankis | Thomaz Bellucci | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #455 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #87 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #85 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #125 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #36 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2012 | 10–5 | 66.7% | #113 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2013 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #131 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #37 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2014 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #86 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2015 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #125 | 1,676 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2016 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #92 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,818 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2017 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #136 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2018 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #116 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #61 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2019 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #66 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #225 | 1,654 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2021 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #104 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #238 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,610 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1303 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 |