H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Ricardas Berankis vs Tommy Haas H2H: 1-0

Ricardas Berankis holds a 1–0 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ricardas Berankis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ricardas Berankis won the 2013 U.S. Men's Clay Court Championship second round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ricardas Berankis
Lithuania Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ricardas Berankis #77 6-3 6-3 Tommy Haas #14 Match data Apr 12, 2013* R16 U.S. Men's Clay Court Championship ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ricardas Berankis #435 #50 909 1,831 104 146 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,116 540 333 61.9% 0 1 0 4 10 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ricardas Berankis Tommy Haas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2008 0–2 0.0% #455 1,535 0 0 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,588 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,722 0 0
20 2010 4–3 57.1% #87 1,698 0 0 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,820 0 0
21 2011 6–10 37.5% #125 1,679 0 0 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,833 0 1
22 2012 10–5 66.7% #113 1,772 0 0 2000 32–21 60.4% #23 1,813 0 1
23 2013 11–16 40.7% #131 1,656 0 0 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,011 0 5
24 2014 6–7 46.2% #86 1,732 0 0 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,863 0 5
25 2015 12–18 40.0% #85 1,716 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2016 8–15 34.8% #92 1,670 0 0 2004 36–19 65.5% #17 1,916 0 7
27 2017 6–7 46.2% #136 1,696 0 0 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,767 0 7
28 2018 7–15 31.8% #116 1,679 0 0 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,892 0 10
29 2019 7–12 36.8% #66 1,709 0 0 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,894 0 11
30 2020 7–7 50.0% #69 1,777 0 0 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,857 0 11
31 2021 13–18 41.9% #104 1,707 0 0 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,940 0 12
32 2022 7–10 41.2% #168 1,659 0 0 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,865 0 12
33 2023 0–1 0.0% #238 1,643 0 0 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,771 0 12
34 — — — — — — — 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,975 0 13
35 — — — — — — — 2013 47–24 66.2% #12 2,024 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,911 0 15
37 — — — — — — — 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,788 0 15
39 — — — — — — — 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,689 0 15

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ricardas Berankis Tommy Haas
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2008 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 10 8 18 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 2010 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1998 18 15 33 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
21 2011 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2012 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 18 9 27 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2013 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2001 41 12 53 77.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0%
24 2014 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 25 14 39 64.1% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2015 11 10 21 52.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2016 8 10 18 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2004 24 11 35 68.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2017 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2018 6 12 18 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2006 34 10 44 77.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7%
29 2019 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2007 31 13 44 70.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
30 2020 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
31 2021 9 10 19 47.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2009 15 14 29 51.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — —
32 2022 6 6 12 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 16 12 28 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 28 15 43 65.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 7 6 13 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
Career — 89 99 188 47.3% 10 28 38 26.3% 5 19 24 20.8% — — — — — 335 197 532 63.0% 117 82 199 58.8% 57 34 91 62.6% 31 20 51 60.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 248/250 of Ricardas Berankis's and 805/873 of Tommy Haas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ricardas Berankis Tommy Haas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2008 2/2 1.5 3.5 45.9% 61.8% 40.9% 31.4% 8.3% 51.2% 31.5% 1996 7/7 3.7 3.9 53.5% 70.9% 59.6% 71.3% 67.6% 65.3% 36.7%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 36/39 5.5 3.8 59.8% 71.0% 49.5% 55.1% 44.9% 62.5% 38.5%
20 2010 7/7 9.6 6.6 53.1% 75.9% 54.6% 47.3% 43.2% 65.8% 35.8% 1998 51/60 4.9 4.1 58.9% 71.1% 48.0% 55.1% 44.2% 61.3% 39.1%
21 2011 16/16 6.3 4.3 50.9% 72.8% 48.4% 57.9% 47.4% 61.0% 37.0% 1999 54/68 8.4 5.6 53.0% 76.3% 50.6% 62.2% 43.2% 64.2% 35.9%
22 2012 15/15 4.5 3.3 49.1% 76.1% 55.9% 57.6% 30.0% 65.7% 37.9% 2000 39/53 7.0 4.4 54.3% 74.2% 51.0% 59.5% 43.0% 63.5% 35.9%
23 2013 27/27 6.1 4.5 55.0% 72.6% 53.3% 64.4% 34.9% 63.8% 35.7% 2001 62/74 7.7 3.9 56.4% 76.7% 52.4% 64.4% 42.5% 66.0% 39.7%
24 2014 13/13 2.8 1.6 56.8% 71.0% 50.0% 51.6% 29.0% 61.8% 36.1% 2002 58/65 8.8 4.8 56.0% 75.4% 52.7% 61.9% 39.6% 65.5% 37.1%
25 2015 30/30 5.4 3.8 57.5% 73.1% 54.7% 64.4% 46.4% 65.2% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2016 22/23 3.0 3.3 57.5% 66.7% 49.4% 53.7% 41.4% 59.3% 37.0% 2004 53/55 5.9 3.4 57.9% 75.9% 52.0% 57.3% 46.4% 65.7% 39.2%
27 2017 12/13 3.1 2.8 56.8% 65.4% 52.0% 52.8% 43.0% 59.5% 35.4% 2005 49/49 6.7 3.6 57.8% 74.3% 52.7% 52.9% 43.6% 65.2% 37.8%
28 2018 22/22 4.6 3.4 59.6% 69.9% 49.4% 59.5% 46.4% 61.2% 31.7% 2006 67/67 7.1 3.2 61.0% 76.4% 54.5% 60.1% 40.2% 67.9% 38.3%
29 2019 19/19 3.7 3.2 58.3% 67.8% 52.3% 54.7% 43.6% 61.4% 36.1% 2007 52/53 8.0 3.0 60.6% 78.1% 55.6% 61.9% 43.3% 69.0% 38.7%
30 2020 14/14 4.4 3.5 59.9% 70.1% 50.2% 56.2% 40.6% 61.9% 37.3% 2008 32/33 7.3 3.8 59.4% 72.6% 52.0% 62.8% 40.9% 64.3% 38.1%
31 2021 31/31 2.7 2.8 60.6% 68.7% 48.3% 57.3% 38.5% 60.8% 37.5% 2009 48/49 9.1 4.9 60.2% 77.6% 53.0% 65.4% 44.8% 67.7% 35.3%
32 2022 17/17 2.4 2.6 60.5% 69.3% 49.1% 49.3% 43.6% 61.3% 33.5% 2010 7/7 9.9 4.6 60.9% 72.3% 50.5% 65.2% 38.4% 63.4% 35.1%
33 2023 1/1 5.0 3.0 59.1% 66.7% 40.7% 40.0% 0.0% 56.1% 31.0% 2011 19/19 7.8 4.3 59.9% 70.7% 51.7% 60.5% 43.6% 62.9% 34.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 47/48 6.2 3.4 59.6% 75.7% 53.9% 65.6% 43.9% 66.9% 39.1%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 68/71 6.1 3.3 61.3% 74.8% 54.0% 63.0% 41.1% 66.6% 37.8%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 25/25 4.6 2.0 63.7% 72.2% 53.8% 56.5% 49.5% 65.3% 36.9%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 11/11 4.0 4.7 62.5% 70.1% 50.4% 52.3% 31.9% 62.8% 31.0%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 20/20 4.8 4.1 61.9% 68.9% 54.0% 61.4% 29.9% 63.1% 31.7%
Career — 248/250 4.3 3.4 57.0% 70.4% 51.1% 57.0% 40.4% 62.1% 35.7% — 805/873 6.9 3.9 58.7% 74.7% 52.5% 60.6% 42.7% 65.5% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ricardas Berankis Tommy Haas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2008 1536 110.1 -0.85 -3.54 0.646 41.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.08 1996 1588 144.9 +0.04 +2.74 1.057 51.8% +30 — — 58.8% +0.77 0–1 2–0 — -0.78
19 2009 1519 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1723 139.6 +1.11 +0.51 1.027 50.7% -2 -80 -102 54.9% +0.37 9–8 (53%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.37
20 2010 1698 127.4 +0.74 -0.38 1.048 51.2% -45 — — 54.2% +0.67 1–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.08 1998 1821 150.9 +0.55 +1.94 1.010 50.5% -13 -133 -149 51.4% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.69
21 2011 1679 131.2 -1.17 +1.02 0.948 49.2% -17 — — 43.2% -0.68 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.45 1999 1833 148.8 +1.86 -1.09 1.003 50.2% +21 -62 -115 60.7% +0.62 13–7 (65%) 20–19 (51%) — +0.33
22 2012 1772 131.1 +1.42 +0.64 1.106 51.1% +4 — — 58.6% +0.21 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.30 2000 1814 145.1 +1.31 -0.68 0.983 49.9% +30 -33 -96 53.0% +0.31 14–3 (82%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.61
23 2013 1656 132.6 -0.15 -0.33 0.985 49.7% +45 -87 -52 45.8% -0.19 3–7 (30%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.35 2001 2012 160.6 +4.03 +2.88 1.170 52.7% +26 -246 -364 67.6% +1.30 17–3 (85%) 13–18 (42%) — -1.10
24 2014 1733 127.5 -1.09 +0.05 0.943 48.6% +16 -28 — 37.9% -0.62 3–1 (75%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.15 2002 1863 149.4 +3.04 +0.31 1.074 51.4% +35 +17 — 62.0% +0.66 19–7 (73%) 17–11 (61%) — +1.60
25 2015 1716 139.0 +0.12 -1.22 0.990 50.1% +31 -109 -82 43.9% -0.39 4–10 (29%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2016 1670 128.7 -2.73 +0.24 0.911 48.1% +60 — -131 35.5% -0.94 5–4 (56%) 4–7 (36%) — +1.16 2004 1917 153.9 +3.05 +2.94 1.143 52.4% +36 -67 -248 60.3% +0.68 10–5 (67%) 9–10 (47%) — -2.50
27 2017 1697 129.0 -1.63 -1.47 0.873 47.4% +59 — — 39.4% -0.73 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +0.35 2005 1767 138.3 +1.76 +0.90 1.088 51.1% +34 +44 -63 58.6% +0.48 4–8 (33%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.64
28 2018 1679 132.8 -2.24 -3.20 0.818 46.8% +25 — -162 30.8% -1.08 5–2 (71%) 5–10 (33%) — -0.96 2006 1892 153.4 +4.99 +1.83 1.194 52.7% +57 -145 -124 69.5% +1.12 13–8 (62%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.81
29 2019 1710 139.9 -1.07 +0.48 0.935 48.9% +10 — — 44.4% -0.67 2–7 (22%) 8–2 (80%) — -0.84 2007 1894 152.7 +4.56 +2.83 1.249 53.6% +31 -196 -35 65.2% +1.02 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — +2.11
30 2020 1777 136.9 -0.68 -0.02 0.978 49.6% -12 — — 51.2% -0.02 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.72 2008 1858 140.5 +1.47 +1.79 1.068 51.1% +30 — +20 54.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.96
31 2021 1708 131.1 -1.85 +0.30 0.957 49.4% -6 -89 — 44.6% -0.36 1–4 (20%) 7–3 (70%) — +1.01 2009 1941 151.0 +3.54 -0.13 1.093 51.7% -108 -141 +173 61.2% +0.76 10–6 (63%) 15–13 (54%) — -1.53
32 2022 1660 130.7 -1.63 -0.82 0.866 47.8% +26 -78 — 39.5% -0.84 2–0 3–1 (75%) — -0.60 2010 1866 115.9 -0.81 -0.45 0.960 49.6% -85 — — 45.5% -0.05 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.43
33 2023 1644 105.8 -0.30 +0.53 0.706 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.12 2011 1772 128.1 -0.01 -0.99 0.941 48.9% +11 — +215 45.1% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 8–6 (57%) — +1.11
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1975 163.7 +4.25 +2.56 1.182 52.7% -70 -48 +106 61.9% +0.71 7–7 (50%) 11–5 (69%) — -1.93
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2024 167.7 +3.58 +2.30 1.133 52.1% -25 +9 +118 65.3% +0.87 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.12
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1911 147.8 +1.08 +0.76 1.066 51.1% +26 +47 — 58.8% +0.77 7–2 (78%) 5–2 (71%) — +1.30
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1788 121.7 -0.85 -1.47 0.835 47.3% +57 — +212 32.3% -1.23 0–3 (0%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.82
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1689 129.1 -1.47 -2.29 0.859 47.7% +75 +108 +206 36.0% -0.80 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.60
Career — 1831 139.3 -1.02 -0.43 0.940 48.9% +19 -82 -105 42.7% -0.50 35–47 (43%) 56–57 (50%) 98.9 +0.29 — 2117 158.2 +2.62 +1.22 1.087 51.5% +10 -44 +3 59.5% +0.62 170–105 (62%) 198–152 (57%) 109.2 -0.69

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.