H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ricardo Acuna vs Claudio Panatta H2H: 0-1
Claudio Panatta holds a 1–0 lead over Ricardo Acuna in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Claudio Panatta leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Claudio Panatta won the 1984 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 66
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 1984* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Claudio Panatta | 6-2 6-3 6-3 | Ricardo Acuna | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricardo Acuna | #1,264 | #47 | 19 | 1,729 | 60 | 101 | 37.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Claudio Panatta | #1,038 | #46 | 18 | 1,748 | 100 | 135 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ricardo Acuna | Claudio Panatta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #312 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #482 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #151 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #76 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1981 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #151 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #100 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #121 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1983 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #91 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1984 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #152 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #153 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1985 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #225 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1986 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #171 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #132 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1987 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #199 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #557 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1988 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #163 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #530 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |