H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Ricardo Acuna vs Hank Pfister H2H: 1-2
Hank Pfister holds a 2–1 lead over Ricardo Acuna in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Hank Pfister leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Ricardo Acuna leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Hank Pfister won the 1985 Cleveland quarterfinal 5-7 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 1985* | Cleveland | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Hank Pfister | 5-7 6-2 6-3 | Ricardo Acuna | Match data |
| Jun 24, 1983* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Ricardo Acuna | 3-6 7-6 7-6 4-6 6-4 | Hank Pfister | Match data |
| Aug 31, 1978* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Hank Pfister | 6-0 6-3 | Ricardo Acuna | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricardo Acuna | #1,264 | #47 | 19 | 1,729 | 60 | 101 | 37.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hank Pfister | #982 | #19 | 0 | 1,926 | 260 | 213 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ricardo Acuna | Hank Pfister | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #312 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #151 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1981 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #151 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #48 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #100 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #29 | 1,839 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1983 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #91 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #30 | 1,841 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1984 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #152 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1985 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1986 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #171 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1987 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #199 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #41 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1988 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #163 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #86 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #530 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #68 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #595 | 1,677 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #980 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |