H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Ricardo Acuna vs Jonathan Canter H2H: 1-0
Ricardo Acuna holds a 1–0 lead over Jonathan Canter in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ricardo Acuna leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ricardo Acuna won the 1986 Forest Hills second round 6-1 2-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 1986* | Forest Hills | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Ricardo Acuna | 6-1 2-6 6-1 | Jonathan Canter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricardo Acuna | #1,264 | #47 | 19 | 1,729 | 60 | 101 | 37.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jonathan Canter | #810 | #36 | 244 | 1,792 | 68 | 96 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ricardo Acuna | Jonathan Canter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #279 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #73 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #312 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #151 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #169 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1981 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #151 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #100 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1983 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #91 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #191 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1984 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #152 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1985 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1986 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #171 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #190 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1987 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #199 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1988 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #163 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #530 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |