H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Ricardo Acuna vs Ken Flach H2H: 1-0
Ricardo Acuna holds a 1–0 lead over Ken Flach in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ricardo Acuna leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ricardo Acuna won the 1986 Livingston third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 1986* | Livingston | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Ricardo Acuna | 6-4 6-4 | Ken Flach | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricardo Acuna | #1,264 | #47 | 19 | 1,729 | 60 | 101 | 37.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ken Flach | #815 | #56 | 130 | 1,714 | 52 | 80 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ricardo Acuna | Ken Flach | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #314 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #312 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #155 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #151 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1981 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #151 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #223 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #100 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #100 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1983 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #91 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #203 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1984 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #152 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #194 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1985 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1986 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #171 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #572 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1987 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #199 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1988 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #163 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #530 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #514 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #835 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |