H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ricardo Acuna vs Peter Doohan H2H: 1-0
Ricardo Acuna holds a 1–0 lead over Peter Doohan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ricardo Acuna leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ricardo Acuna won the 1986 Indianapolis second round 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 1986 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Ricardo Acuna | 7-6 6-3 | Peter Doohan | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricardo Acuna | #1,264 | #47 | 19 | 1,729 | 60 | 101 | 37.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Peter Doohan | #1,102 | #43 | 140 | 1,737 | 50 | 82 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ricardo Acuna | Peter Doohan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #549 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #312 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #151 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #363 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1981 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #151 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #85 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #100 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #101 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1983 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #91 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1984 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #152 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #72 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1985 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #187 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1986 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #171 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1987 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #199 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,435 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1988 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #163 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1131 | 1,427 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #530 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,421 | 0 | 1 |