H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ricardo Acuna vs Robert Seguso H2H: 3-0
Ricardo Acuna holds a 3–0 lead over Robert Seguso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ricardo Acuna leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ricardo Acuna won the 1985 Cincinnati second round 2-6 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 1985* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ricardo Acuna | 2-6 6-4 7-6 | Robert Seguso | Match data |
| Jul 3, 1985* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Ricardo Acuna | 6-4 7-6 6-2 | Robert Seguso | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1983* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Ricardo Acuna | 6-1 6-3 6-2 | Robert Seguso | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricardo Acuna | #1,264 | #47 | 19 | 1,729 | 60 | 101 | 37.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Robert Seguso | #773 | #22 | 242 | 1,885 | 86 | 90 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ricardo Acuna | Robert Seguso | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #321 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #312 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #209 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #151 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #56 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1981 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #151 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #28 | 1,843 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #100 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #135 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1983 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #91 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #37 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1984 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #152 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1985 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #367 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1986 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #171 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #818 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1987 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #199 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1988 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #163 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #530 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |