H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Ricardo Cano vs Butch Seewagen H2H: 2-0
Ricardo Cano holds a 2–0 lead over Butch Seewagen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ricardo Cano leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Ricardo Cano won the 1977 Toronto third round 6-7 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 75
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 80
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 1977* | Toronto | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Ricardo Cano | 6-7 7-6 6-3 | Butch Seewagen | Match data |
| Jul 21, 1977* | Washington | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ricardo Cano | 4-6 6-1 6-3 | Butch Seewagen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricardo Cano | #768 | #41 | 0 | 1,792 | 142 | 147 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Butch Seewagen | #826 | #87 | 0 | 1,679 | 67 | 83 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ricardo Cano | Butch Seewagen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #274 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1975 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #42 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1976 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #51 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1977 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 10–11 | 47.6% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1978 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #81 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #96 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1979 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #169 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #200 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #73 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1981 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #62 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #183 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1982 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #91 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #147 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #219 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #227 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |